Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Education is an arduous but incredibly important process, and outcomes of it highly depend on those, who provide it. Personally, I think that education can be enhanced if institutions increase their professors` salaries. There are a few reasons why I hold this stance.
First of all, if professors are paid more, quality of their classes will improve. When a teacher feels that his paycheck does not satisfy him financially, he does not strive to do his job as well as he supposed to. This instantly reflects on the quality of knowledge that his students gain. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was in a pharmacy school, my educators did not make much money and did not appreciate their employment. Some of them did not try to explain complicated topics to students in order to make it understandable, and, so, very often, I had gaps in my knowledge. Conversely, in my brothers` college where professors had advantageous salaries, students were knowledgeable since their professors endeavored to make lectures interesting and productive. In fact, when graduating, my sibling had better awareness about his profession than I did.
Secondly, teachers, who are financially protected, have a positive attitude at a workplace and encourage students to learn more. On the other hand, if a professor is not happy with his paycheck, he can expose this anger to pupils, which is not going to help young people to increase intellectually. For instance, in my pharmacy school, which I mentioned above, a lot of teachers and their assistants were always moody. Sometimes, they even yelled at us. This made me feel down and the only thing I wanted is to run away from a classroom. Therefore, since I was psychologically suppressed, I could not comprehend a learning material. I am sure that if my institution had supported professors fiscally in a better way, I would have never experienced such as difficulties in learning. This example illustrates how negatively a low level of pedagogues` income can affect the academical performance of students.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that if universities increase salaries of their teachers, students will definitely benefit from it. This is because it will inspire academics to perfect their class sessions, and will help emotionally both professors and learners to keep up with the educational process
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18134715026 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23998714687 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598445595855 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9167619185 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2380952381 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.380952381 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90476190476 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0587955989202 0.236089414692 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0182062657115 0.076458572812 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0217768813855 0.0737576698707 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0369909909483 0.150856017488 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182281853563 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.