Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It goes without saying that education is an important part of people's lives because during university time they get to prepare for their future jobs. Improving the quality of education is crucial and when it comes to this issue some controversy arises as to how education quality can get better. Some people hold the opinion that universes should increase professors’ salaries for this goal and I concur with it. In the ensuing lines, I will explain two reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
First, higher salary helps professors to be aware of new technologies and ideas and transfer their knowledge to their students. When professors are able to make money more than their routine needs, they can afford to take part in different conferences and seminars in different parts of the world. Besides, they can attend new classes and update their information. In these events, they can interact with other professors and share their new discoveries and perspectives and even ask them to give a presentation or speech in their classes that help students boost their knowledge and get familiar with a wide array of viewpoints. For instance, I got my bachelor in a top university which paid professors higher salary than other universities and the professors used to take part in different occasion and the quality of classes were better than my master university which was not a top one.
Second, the more people make money, the more comfortable life they have so they usually have fewer concerns and more time. Thinking about financial problems can take a lot of energy, therefore, when professors make a suitable amount of money they do not need to take other jobs like teaching private classes; as a result they have more time to spend on studying and writing new papers and they have more time to allocate to students' visits. It comes as no surprise that the quality of education increases drastically as professors have more free time. Take a physics professor in a University of Yale as an example, if he does not have enough money he has to spend his time doing other jobs like teaching in a highs cool for making more money, as a result, he will be less time at university, also, he has no free time studying new theories in physics.
In conclusion, according to aforementioned explanations and examples growth in professors’ salaries can improve the quality of education because they can take part in different events and they have fewer concerns and more time to focus on their main career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 710, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...time doing other jobs like teaching in a highs cool for making more money, as a r...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, second, so, therefore, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2090.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92924528302 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75502389089 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483490566038 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.8495695824 48.9658058833 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.285714286 100.406767564 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2857142857 20.6045352989 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184584077395 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712090461424 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465453873701 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11918412612 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267987759168 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 58.1214874552 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.