Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is undeniable that education is an integral part of our lives, and these days, universities are concerned by many students who desire to get a high-quality education. Personally, I strongly believe that university professors' salaries are essential for improving education. I feel this way for two significant reasons, which I will explore in the subsequent paragraphs.
First and foremost, spending a large amount of money on salaries can attract high-quality professors. In contemporary society, there are limited expert professors, which they have a high value. However, signing them will guarantee that they will play a significant role in the improvement of the quality of education. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was an architecture student, I had studied in a specific class that intensively improve students' English skills, known as the international intensive class. In this class, all subjects were taught in English by native speakers who were paid in high salaries. These instructors effectively develop our English skills, and they also taught many interesting things about foreign cultures and traditions. As you can see, spending money on salaries clearly support universities to improve their education.
Secondly, gaining a high salary will make professors have a strong passion for teaching. To be specific, they tend to work harder because they need to maintain quality performance for a career's stability. For instance, at my university, there was a salary system that was used for maintaining the quality of education. Instructors who worked effectively got a reward or extra bonus. One of my favorite teachers, Tony, had produced consistently high performances. His teaching was exciting and intelligible because he also had creative ways to educate students, such as using videos and pictures, and the majority of students really loved him. Moreover, many students who studied with him could get higher scores and understand the materials better. As a result, he acquired additional remuneration, and he also got promoted and earned more salary. His story demonstrates how investing high teacher's salaries obviously had a positive impact on the quality of education.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that spending money on professors' salaries can improve the quality of education. This is due to the fact that high-salary not only can attract high-quality teachers, but it also can motivate them to teach students effectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'careers'' or 'career's'?
Suggestion: careers'; career's
...d to maintain quality performance for a careers stability. For instance, at my universi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: ADDED_BONUS[1]
Message: This phrase might be redundant. Use simply 'bonus'.
Suggestion: bonus
... who worked effectively got a reward or extra bonus. One of my favorite teachers, Tony, had...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2110.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45219638243 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10219820922 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0592941334 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9090909091 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5909090909 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201879676822 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643847837992 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788345212428 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135039326147 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291867854368 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.