Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?“It is better to do one project first and then begin to do another than to do several projects at the same time.”

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
“It is better to do one project first and then begin to do another than to do several projects at the same time.”

Modern companies demand more and more multifaceted employees to improve the efficiency of work so as to gain the advantage over other competitors. In this direction, having the ability to do several tasks at the same time will definitely increase the chance of finding or keeping a job in the job market. Therefore, I suggest that people should improve the ability of working several projects at one time because of some reasons stated below.
To begin with, it is possible to save much time when you work on multiple projects simultaneously. By doing so, you can expect having more free time after finishing the assignment. As every human kind needs to have a specific leisure time after working hard, the time saved can be a panacea relieving the workplace stress. Take my experience as a graduate student for example, what I had to deal with was more than classes and homework, I had to give a lecture instead of my professor and also prepare for GRE exam at the same time. If I had done the assignments one by one, I would not have had enough time to rest. To this end, I found the solution in working all the assigned works at one time to save my valuable time.
As to the second point, having the capability to work on several tasks at the same time would significantly increase the efficiency of the workplace. This is the fact that all company owners try to find multi-functional employees to increase the creativity, smartness, and also the functionality of their organization. In my last working place, for instance, I lost my chance to get a promotion because I could not speak two languages at the same time. The company I was working for got the franchise of selling products of a multinational company which was located originally in the Spain. So, they were looking for someone who could speak both English and Spanish. If I had just spoken two languages, I could have gotten this chance for sure.
Paradoxically, it can be quite tough to do the projects at the same time for those who cannot concentrate on more than one thing. Some people may lose their concentration when they deal with several tasks. Nevertheless, it can be possible for some others to focus and manage their concentrations on different tasks. Moreover, if you do the projects at the same time, you can know how to come up with more ideas faster. This will advance the decision-making process to be done more effectively.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that it is better to do several tasks simultaneously because it helps to save time for other activities, it enhances the efficiency of the working place, and you can also know the ways to get the ideas more quickly. This is why I posited the supportive assertion to do several projects at the same time.

Votes
Average: 6.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...oyees to improve the efficiency of work so as to gain the advantage over other competito...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2271.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 482.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71161825726 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82510229464 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45643153527 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 742.5 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6556383121 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.227272727 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26626758809 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946910821012 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977962969604 0.0737576698707 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183730933251 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782195956407 0.0645574589148 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.