Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

even when it is widely known that exist many fields of knowledge that are out of our comprehetion yet, the amount of information that the humanity have is enormous. this fact has provoked that some people focus on mastering one subject, whereas others prefer to acquire information about many of them. Whether is better one position or the other one, though, is a matter of intense debate. As far as I am concerned, I firmly believe that it is more beneficial to be top in one field that average in many of them. this position is based on two main reasons that will be analyzed thoroughly below.

Firsly, companies find people able to specialized, with a broad knowledge in their respectives field, not with experience in many fields. The question that arise here is, why that happen in that way? The anwers is simple. An specialist know what he need to do each moment, so you so not need three or four of them to complete a job, because he has gathered a amount of knowledge and experience that allow him to be succefull even when he is alone do it that task. A compelling example of that was a job that I realized two month ago. I installed a solar field in a remote area. due to the complexity of the taks and the elevated number of equipment needed, there was room for only one engineer. Since I had experience in similar tasks I was selected to do it. To make a long history short, even when during the proccess surged many difficulties, thanks to specialization I was able to reach the waited results.

Secondly, to be excellent in one area guarantee that you will have the recognition of your colleagues and your words will be always listened. To prove that this point is correct, we just have to check the empiric experience. Who many specialist do you know that excel due to they general knowledge about many topic? No to many per sure. Otherwise, I am sure that you can mention at least 3 o 4 cientists with the novel award, even when they are masters only in one field. Moreover, when one of them give an opinion everyone pay attention an even si taken as an argument in a debate. that happen because the knowledge that they have about that subject is so deep that is taken as right every word that they say about it.

In summation, I am of the opinion that is more vital for the professional future of a person to excel in one subject than to have a general knowledge about a broad numer of fields. this is because the it is more appreciated for the companies, and the prestige that give as specialist.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Even
even when it is widely known that exist many...
^^^^
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ion that the humanity have is enormous. this fact has provoked that some people focu...
^^^^
Line 1, column 514, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...one field that average in many of them. this position is based on two main reasons t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will be analyzed thoroughly below. Firsly, companies find people able to sp...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 57, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'broad knowledge'.
Suggestion: broad knowledge
...s find people able to specialized, with a broad knowledge in their respectives field, not with ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 223, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'A' instead of 'An' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: A
...ppen in that way? The anwers is simple. An specialist know what he need to do each...
^^
Line 9, column 358, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...complete a job, because he has gathered a amount of knowledge and experience that...
^
Line 9, column 524, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'month' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'months'.
Suggestion: months
...e of that was a job that I realized two month ago. I installed a solar field in a rem...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 579, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Due
...stalled a solar field in a remote area. due to the complexity of the taks and the e...
^^^
Line 9, column 696, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
..., there was room for only one engineer. Since I had experience in similar tasks I was...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... able to reach the waited results. Secondly, to be excellent in one area gu...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 118, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'will' and 'be'.
Suggestion: will always be
...ition of your colleagues and your words will be always listened. To prove that this point is c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 305, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun topic seems to be countable; consider using: 'many topics'.
Suggestion: many topics
...cel due to they general knowledge about many topic? No to many per sure. Otherwise, I am s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 317, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: Now
...hey general knowledge about many topic? No to many per sure. Otherwise, I am sure ...
^^
Line 17, column 584, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...en si taken as an argument in a debate. that happen because the knowledge that they ...
^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...every word that they say about it. In summation, I am of the opinion that i...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 182, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...nowledge about a broad numer of fields. this is because the it is more appreciated f...
^^^^
Line 25, column 198, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
... broad numer of fields. this is because the it is more appreciated for the companies, ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, at least, you know

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 31.0 11.0286738351 281% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2086.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 462.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51515151515 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56840596618 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493506493506 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.0 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8860248362 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6956521739 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0869565217 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.73913043478 5.45110844103 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 18.0 5.5376344086 325% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230856513745 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578425133844 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458184679897 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138904257153 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214935490169 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.