Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another.
Without a shadow of a doubt, The place people live plays a pivotal role in their lives' quality, not to mention their subsistence levels. An unanswered question in this area is whether individuals should invariably migrate between various cities. Despite all the arguments asserting that moving from one place to another leads to an appealing life, dealing with enjoyable challenges, I believe otherwise, maintaining that staying in one city in a lifetime is more consistent with human's nature. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoints through two compelling reasons.
First and foremost, People get accustomed to the environment they live in, which makes them emotionally dependent. To put it more simply, as individuals grow, they endeavor to establish numerous relationships with assorted characters within their society, people homogenous in culture, religion, and general mindset, to fulfill their distinctive need for communication. Hence, individuals become attached to the affections around them, supporting them in a myriad of facets, so putting them all aside in order to live in another place may have deleterious sentimental ramifications. Moreover, finding appropriate people to establish new links may take quite a long time, and changing living places will always seize the joy of hanging out with old and intimate friends. For example, consider a juvenile seeking to visit all around the world. This person should give up all of their assets and relations and might not find others compatible with their attitude and culture; therefore, they might get harmed mentally.
Another reason worthwhile mentioning is that trying to keep up with the new situation might dilute the life's quality. In other words, constant change in living place requires an alteration in occupation, and usually, it takes a substantial amount of time for a person to become stabilized in their position. Meanwhile, the subsistence level can be reduced due to financial inconsistencies between various countries. To put it in a vivid picture, even after procuring a fixed position, the quality of one's life might not be as same as the previous city, since the money on the new town has higher credit than the previous one. As a result, one may work diligently in order to provide themselves as they want; otherwise, they should accept the lower-quality lifestyle. My personal experience is a great example of this. Years ago, I immigrated to Canada with my family, which has a higher value currency than Iran. Therefore, all of our deposits were not reckoned as much as Iran, which led to a more humble life. Besides, my father could not find a suitable occupation, yet, he was a chief in Iran's pharmacy factories.
Reflecting upon all reasons mentioned above, one soon realizes that the advantages of moving between various places for a living are infinitesimal when compared to its advantages. This is because not only does it harm individuals emotionally, but it also makes the life condition totally different and mostly weaker.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding affections'?
Suggestion: the surrounding affections
.... Hence, individuals become attached to the affections around them, supporting them in a myriad of facets,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 501, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...curing a fixed position, the quality of ones life might not be as same as the previo...
^^^^
Line 7, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on totally different and mostly weaker.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2566.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 487.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26899383984 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9177365884 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591375770021 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 819.0 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.443337912 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.19047619 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1904761905 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47619047619 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253735812929 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063528787461 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721506855059 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162605895167 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509132195336 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.01818996416 122% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 86.8835125448 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.