Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another.
In modern days, it appears to some that due to the rapid development of technology and diversification in communication equipment and transportation system in the world, pulling up stakes and moving to favorite cities have been a convenient thing. Others maintain a traditional view that rooting in one city is way much better. While these ideas have their bases, they need to be scrutinized meticulously before we reach a conclusion. In my opinion, moving from place to place is better in many aspects.
First of all, from a mental health perspective, finding a beloved shack is not an individual behavior but also a pursuit for social identity. As an old saying,' Birds of a feather flock together.' like-minded people always live in similar regions, which means you can get a bunch of friends who share the same interests and goals. In addition, the best method to evade sorrowful recollection or exhausting work is to escape and embrace a brand-new environment, a sort of renascence of life in the easiest way. For example, a tropic city with white-sand beaches and coconut-scented sea breeze will wipe out all your gloomy thoughts. Even a person who prefers winter, could wallow in thick snow and build snowmen with exhilaration after fleeing from a sweltering area.
Moreover, from a developmental perspective, living in different cities also have economic benefits. For instance, the government in my country encourages domestic traveling and dwelling and advertise rural tourist attractions to stimulate the economy and currency circulation. People who get tired of stressful city life and endless tasks now have a chance to move to a tranquil town and work remotely online or even away from work. They can blow their steam by fishing, doing yoga, getting meditation, or even set mind blank. When you are leisurely sipping red tea on your balcony which is towards picturesque mountain view or sauntering in town, chatting with your neighborhood, picking gadgetry of exotic aesthetics, not only pampering yourself but also boosting local income, it is forming a virtuous cycle.
More or less, people who habitually lives in a fixed place may criticize that it is not stable to move frequently, and detrimental to career development, or mere immoral to against tradition since their clans have been rooted in it for decades. However, without population mobility, the society we live in will not be as much vital as it is right now. Imagine a world without adventurous people, if there is no exploration of novel places, and no intercommunication among different people, like a stagnant pond without fresh water, the insularity wall would become impenetrable, leading to much severe aftermath.
Therefore, on a micro level, moving from one place to another is a way of unleashing and seeking happiness, on a macro level, it is relative to the functioning of the whole society. The smallest flaps of a butterfly's wings can trigger a catastrophe in motion. A wise choice,like moving, can shape a better future too. While there are one thousand Hamlets in one thousand people's eyes, I believe my opponents will compromise after reading my article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Like-minded
...ing, Birds of a feather flock together. like-minded people always live in similar regions, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have a chance to move to a tranquil town and work remotely online or even away fr...
^^
Line 7, column 588, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...wall would become impenetrable, leading to much severe aftermath. Therefore, on...
^^
Line 9, column 274, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , like
...r a catastrophe in motion. A wise choice,like moving, can shape a better future too. ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, sort of, first of all, in my opinion, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2645.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 515.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1359223301 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99265698879 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 316.0 212.727598566 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61359223301 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 838.8 618.680645161 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.1372383572 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.227272727 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4090909091 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281372517258 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653314688331 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573390430989 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134959329061 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459584936631 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.01818996416 122% => OK
difficult_words: 163.0 86.8835125448 188% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.