Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
In modern days, it appears to some that due to the rapid evolution of technology and diversification of internet service and communication equipment, interconnection among different people from two sides of the world has been a convenient thing that is taken for granted. Others maintain a relatively conservative view of providing Internet access to all citizens. While these ideas have their bases, they need to be scrutinized meticulously. In my opinion, Internet providing is necessary.
First of all, from a societal perspective, Internet infrastructure will be a rewarding necessity for connecting the most fringe and deprived areas with the most wealthy and developed regions.
In addition, the populace will have more opportunities to browse for information and find or even create jobs from a long distance.
For example, people who hail from Guizhou Province can consult online about applying for a graphic engineer job in Shanghai without arriving at the scene in person.
Moreover, from an educational perspective, mandatory education can be effectively provided for young people since online boot camps are much more available than field cram schools.
For instance, my sister by the name of Nancy comes from the poorest area of Hubei in China. There are not many sophisticated teaching resources in the whole city, not to mention the interest-oriented classes like watercolor, oil painting, calligraphy et cetera. But she self-taught all that stuff and even learned how to play bass guitar since she searched tutorials easily through the Internet. If getting perplexed by school tasks while nobody is around, she would throw the question onto a learning group and some warmhearted would solve it and explain it to her.
A voice rises that such service at no cost is a budget burden, and will reveal the uneven distribution between different social classes and cause friction. However, without the Internet, the rift will still exist and perpetuate, we can not be an ostrich and just bury our heads in the sand . Exposure of the truth will pave way for our descendants to finally overcome, and our paid taxes should set into the right place. Otherwise, the insularity wall will become impenetrable and finally cause irreversible aftermath.
Therefore, on a micro level, people may get a brighter future out of Internet construction. on a macro level, invisible infrastructure is also the cornerstone for the functioning of the whole society. While there are one thousand Hamlets in one thousand people's eyes, I believe my opponents will compromise after reading my article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 290, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rich and just bury our heads in the sand . Exposure of the truth will pave way for...
^^
Line 12, column 93, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...er future out of Internet construction. on a macro level, invisible infrastructure...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2189.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31310679612 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01200532362 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638349514563 0.524837075471 122% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3991039205 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.210526316 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6842105263 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94736842105 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.53405017921 176% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168997671347 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526729048684 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705314878868 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0628712738532 0.150856017488 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680003452933 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.