Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use spec
The topic of whether working long hours three days a week is more enjoyable than working fewer hours five days a week has aroused controversial debates among people and scholars. While some people are inclined towards the idea that having a job with longer hours a day and more free time is more satisfying, others have a negative attitude towards this idea. As far As I am concerned, I am of the opinion that having a job where you work shorter hours per day is more enjoyable. In the following paragraph, I will delve into the crucial reasons and examples justifying my point of view.
The first reason coming to my mind is that working long hours a day leads employees to feel stress and overwhelmed due to the excessive workload. Working three days means one should fulfill their responsibilities and backbreaking tasks in a short period of time. As a result, employees will get stress because she or he should do the tasks before the deadline. The stress caused by work has a devastating influence on employee's health. Therefore, they would not happy with their situation. For instance, one of my friends has worked 12 hours a day for three days in a large corporation. In spite of his healthy lifestyle, he is diagnosed with diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. The doctor said it is because of stress at work. No one can be happy with illness even with more holidays and high income.
Another noteworthy reason is that working more days during a week can secure a permanent job in this highly competitive job market. Scientifically proven that employees with three or fewer days of work per day are more likely to be laid off when cut needs to be. Working three days in some places consider a part-time job. As a result, they are not secure at the workplace which causes enormous trouble in their life. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When first time I hired by a local company, I had to choose between working either long hours but fewer days a week or long hours as usual employees. Since I was tempted by the idea that having more free time means hanging out more time with my beloved family members. However, it ends up making me redundant because of an economic crisis that our company faces as I was considered part-time employees for them.
From what has been discussed above, we can conclude that the advantages of working short hours a day per week far outweigh the other option. This way not only provides employees less stressful life which has harmful effects on their health but also it guarantees security permanent job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ities and backbreaking tasks in a short period of time. As a result, employees will get stress...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
... by work has a devastating influence on employees health. Therefore, they would not happy...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 619, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... week or long hours as usual employees. Since I was tempted by the idea that having m...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2119.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 450.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70888888889 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60376650259 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513333333333 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9807930765 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1304347826 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5652173913 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95652173913 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448948526334 0.236089414692 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117954181608 0.076458572812 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106985376827 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274024900667 0.150856017488 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124606312201 0.0645574589148 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.