Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.

Undeniably, there exist many criteria that can positively or negatively affect people's performance in a workplace. In this vein, the working hours and the number of days people have to spend on their job is of significant attention. For some people working five days a week for shorter hour can be more pleasant; however, for me it is more preferential to work only three days a week for long hours. The reasons, including but not limited to the following, can substantiate my viewpoint.
To begin with, being under stress and pressure of working only three days for longer hour can make the person more efficiently. To be more specific, contrary to many people who believe that working longer hours only in three days can exhaust people, it is taken for granted that it can be more efficacious. In other words, when people are under pressure, their mind becomes more active and can concentrate better on what they are doing, as a result of which the job can be accomplished with a better productivity. Not to mention the fact that when people work only for three days, it means that they can be for themselves for the rest of the week, making their mind even more active and fresh. This situation cannot happen in case where people have to work five days a week even with shorter working time. For instance, my sister was a teacher for five grades student and she had to be at school five days a week, for only two hours. When she came back home, she was surprisingly tired and it seemed as though she had worked for ten hours. After a while, the school policy was changed and teachers had to work only for three days instead of the whole weekdays. When she was under a lot of pressure and stress of limited working day, she seemed to be more fresh and productive. There was no signs of lethargy or exhaustion.
The next reason in line is that when a person works for three hours, more time will be provided for him or her to enjoy his or her private life or does other activities. To put it in other words, working for five days a week even with shorter hours means that the person should always be on the rush of doing something and cannot have free time to focus on his or her personal life. However, although the person will be under more pressure when working longer hours for three days, more freedom will be provided to enjoy the life or the person can do other activities as well. For instance, I am a language teacher and I used to work all week and I had some classes in one day and only one class in another day. It was really excruciating for me simply because I could not do whatever I wanted to do. I could not go out with my friends for two or three days because I had classes, I could not go out shopping, and I could not study and have some quality time of mine. This issue did not last until I decided to reschedule and arrange all my classes only on three days. Although at first it was really awful working long hours, I felt much better having some time for myself.
To recap, taking the above-mentioned reason and examples into account, it is more enjoyable for me to work three days for longer hours. Not only is it more mind refreshing, but it also provides me with a better chance to concentrate on my own life.

Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'hours'' or 'hour's'?
Suggestion: hours'; hour's
... for five days a week even with shorter hours means that the person should always be ...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, so, well, while, for instance, as a result, in other words, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 27.0 13.8261648746 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2641.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 600.0 407.700716846 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.40166666667 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94923200384 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36395090662 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.393333333333 0.524837075471 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 823.5 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.5298029918 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.041666667 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414089567996 0.236089414692 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144382456996 0.076458572812 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102588007761 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297011689149 0.150856017488 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682997620089 0.0645574589148 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.54 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.