Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, it is clear and more noticeable that having a good job which had a great impact on people's lives. While developing technology makes accessible everything but it also persuasion people to be more wise and unwilling to spend their all-time busy. Furthermore, It is a pleasure to have a kinda job in which we work for a few days. Personally, I think it is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for short hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for longer hours for some reasons. In the following, I will point out some outstanding reasons.
First, by taking a part-time job, we can invest our time and choose wisely. There are some reliefs that pervade full-time jobs that have more options over part-time jobs, but I think there is prejudice. We can do a lot of staff after work or on days that we don't attend to work. For example, my coworker is consulted on our project. He attends to his job for a few hours and in his free time, he plays and teaches the violin. Thus he has 2 major in his life and make money by programming and teaching violin. I believe it's helpful for him and persuasion him to do his work in this way.
The second point that supports my idea is that, as we all know we need some free time to take a break in our lives to do something that charges our introverts. Albeit, we have holidays and rest days, after that, we go back and do certain routines as usual. So it doesn't challenge enough. Sometimes these circumstances that we chain to the desk and repeat the same job makes malfunction in our overall performance and our ability to adapt whit our environment. Profuse insatiable in getting a promotion, or making money cause to expel of company.
So, to a short long story, I disagree with this statement that it is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours for some reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... of staff after work or on days that we dont attend to work. For example, my coworke...
^^^^
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... time, he plays and teaches the violin. Thus he has 2 major in his life and make mon...
^^^^
Line 4, column 263, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...and do certain routines as usual. So it doesnt challenge enough. Sometimes these circu...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, thus, while, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.32702702703 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46625286904 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497297297297 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 506.7 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2796669868 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9444444444 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.485540672808 0.236089414692 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13245533943 0.076458572812 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.220200656393 0.0737576698707 299% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.370472339246 0.150856017488 246% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.285228273956 0.0645574589148 442% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.83 10.9000537634 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.