Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to suppo

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Working hours are frequently related to satisfaction towards their job or even life. Some believe that to deal with work in fewer days every week for longer hours is more enjoyable; while others consider it more appreciable to work shorter hours every day and for more days per week. As far as I am concerned, the latter opinion sounds more sensible. And I will elaborate my reasons for supporting working five days a week for fewer hours in the ensuing paragraphs.
To begin with, working five days is better for the employee's health. Workers staying in their company for shorter hours everyday do not need to get up quite early in the morning and stay up late in the evening, which allows them relatively abundant hours to take a good rest and sleep. Moreover, they also enjoy the privilege to have decent meals in the day instead grabbing something casually to eat. On the other hand, nevertheless, people who go to work for longer hours tend to reduce their sleep hours and sacrifice good meals to squeeze time for work. Since sound sleep and nutritious food are essential to human's health, workers doing their job for longer hours are more prone to disease than those for shorter hours in the long run.
Moreover, people entitled to adequate time are likely to perform better in work field. It takes time and energy to finish tasks well. If employee only work three days a week, it is unavoidable they are under the pressure to wrap up their assignment in a shorter time than those who work five days. This will put them in a more urgent mental state, which is definitely not a helper to creative and well-done performance. On the contrary, five days a week will allow workers more time to carry it out well.
Admittedly, some people might argue that working five days a week will hinder employee's plan for a long-time journey. With only the weekend at their disposal, they find it difficult to launch travel of high quality. However, I think people with the demand of longer holidays can always ask for leave as long as they finish their work beforehand or make it up afterwards. After all, it is not like that workers need to go out for a long trip every week.
To put it in a nutshell, different people hole their own preference concerning the arrangement of working hour, though, the merits of working five days a week for shorter hours outperform those of the other plan. Therefore, I disagree with the statement with all due consideration.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 52, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...th, working five days is better for the employees health. Workers staying in their compan...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 120, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ying in their company for shorter hours everyday do not need to get up quite early in th...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, after all, i think, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2025.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6875 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43733072466 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493055555556 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 622.8 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.729946777 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.25 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39754751565 0.236089414692 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131305298482 0.076458572812 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865525516685 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24793663845 0.150856017488 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640107409866 0.0645574589148 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.