Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to suppo

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

There is no doubt that nowadays, job plays a key role in our lives, and nobody can deny the influence of the job’s duration in our daily life. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this issue is that doing a job with longer hours, but in fewer days in a week is better than a job with more days with shorter hours. Some people may hold this viewpoint that having a job only three days a week but with longer hours is better whereas others hold exactly opposite perspective. From my perspective, the first belief is true; in what follows I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons.

The first reason coming to my mind at first is that by going to a job only three days a week, people have more time to go to travel with their family or friends. This means that they have more free time for having fun. Since people want to go to another city or a place far from their hometown, they need more time to do this. For example, my uncle who has a job that they only go there 3 days a week, every two weeks he and his family go to a vacation and visit a new small city surrounding their hometown. He tolerates the long hours during those three days but on the other hand, he enjoys the weekend more than people go to work every day. As you can see, by going to a job during a week people wouldn’t enough time to have a beautiful journey with their family and friends.

Another reason which deserves some words here is that by completing a job in fewer days, people have less stress during the rest of the week. This is a fact that thinking of doing a task every day and putting energy to complete it, causes a lot of stress for people until they can finish them. For instance, my professor assigns some projects and define two or three days for doing them. He put all his effort and get help from students to complete it ASAP. when it has done, all of them feel happy and waking up in the morning without stress to doing tasks. They also plan for each free day having a good time and accumulate their energy to start new weeks. This experience taught me that waking up only three days a week with thinking about my assignments, do it all of them to feel more relaxed during the rest of the week.

To wrap it up, though some may oppose this idea, doing a job during a few days a week with longer hours would be more beneficial for people. Not only will people have more free time to go travel with their friends but also they feel less stress and tension during the rest of the week. All in all, it anticipates that people could decide more narrowly that which type of those jobs are convenient for them to have a better life.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 459, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...help from students to complete it ASAP. when it has done, all of them feel happy and...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, regarding, so, whereas, for example, for instance, no doubt, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2161.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 504.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.2876984127 4.8611393121 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.14688682687 2.67179642975 80% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434523809524 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 654.3 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.6515151184 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.05 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381542730984 0.236089414692 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128437509992 0.076458572812 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731491438114 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253635303048 0.150856017488 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324237623191 0.0645574589148 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 58.1214874552 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.9 10.9000537634 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.