Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The government's funding, the money from annual taxes, has been valued and even triggers heated discussion over whether governments should spend money to improve Internet access or public transportation. Public transportation, in many people's views, need to be advocated. Contrary to these people's opinion is my perspective that Internet access is more remarkable to obtain the support of the governments, due to the contributions to benefit for students and adults.
What must be prioritized is that Internet access, rather than public transportation, is beneficial to students by boosting academic learning and professional development. Initially, only by learning on the internet can students reap and harvest a great deal of knowledge. To explain it further, while doing homework, students can search for a wide range of relevant expertise in fields such as language, arts, and history on the internet; in contrast, public transportation can not help students to acquire more knowledge. Moreover, never can we ignore the advantages of the internet to teenagers' professional development. In detail, there is a large quantity of knowledge that can extend students' outlook, which can be favorable to their future career location such as engineer, doctor, and so on, they will know what they are interested in and what they are good at; on the other hand, will public transportation be more constructive to students' career?
What is equally worth discussing is that only by improving internet access, instead of improving public transportation, can governments be favorable to adults' efficiency and relationship. To begin with, it is important for adults to promote their efficiency by working online. To be more specific, when adults work on the internet, they can record their meeting documents, make slides, and use excels, which will help them save a lot of time and reduce errors; on the contrary, taking public transportation can not make people more efficient. Furthermore, never can we ignore the advantage of internet access to adults' relationships. Specifically, it is the internet that connects people from all over the world, which can strengthen people's relationships by assisting people in appreciating pictures of their friends or families on social media networks through Facebook, Instagram, and so on; however, under no circumstances can public transportation maintain people's bonds.
Students, the foundation of the country's future, can be fostered when they access the internet more easily. Adults, the bedrock of the country, can be more beneficial to getting online when internet access is improved. In conclusion, only by spending money to improve internet access can governments help students and adults reap numerous benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...need to be advocated. Contrary to these peoples opinion is my perspective that Internet...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tead of improving public transportation, can governments be favorable to adults e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, while, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2337.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52482269504 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12760328667 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498817966903 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.1801170682 48.9658058833 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.0625 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4375 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 5.45110844103 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241257620296 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978321342964 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614221789812 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174765328445 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466191561921 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 11.7677419355 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 58.1214874552 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 10.9000537634 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.