Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The leaps and bounds of technology today have ushered in the widespread use of the internet. The importance of the internet brings the light a question that has been asked several times, that is, whether the government should give more financial support to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. As far as I am concerned, I am against this statement and believe that it is more crucial to enhance public transportation.
The foremost reason that I am supporting this idea is that the population consists of people who are of different ages. To be more specific, public transportation plays a much more vital role in the elder's life than the internet does. Although teenagers and adults use the internet in their daily life, the elder seldom use it. Take my grandmother for example. She seldom surfed the internet and did not have her own smartphone. The internet was unnecessary to her life. Thus, since the government should spend money to benefit all the people, it is not necessary to cost money on enhancing internet access.
Another point I should deem is that public transportation should be sponsored since thousands of millions of citizens rely on it every day. To delineate, if the transportation is out of date and cannot feet to citizens' needs, traveling and commuting will be a difficult task. All of the residents, regardless of their age, use public transportation since it is much more convenient and eco-friendly. For example, my grandmother often went on a trip by train since the cost is cheap and it is convenient. As a result, public transportation should gain much more funding from the government.
Last but not least, negative effects will be presented by improving Internet access. If the internet is easy to access, it is hard for parents to prevent children from watching inappropriate videos and posts which will have negative effects on kids' behavior. Since children are not mature to distinguish between reality and fiction, children will imitate those videos that they watch on the internet. Therefore, it is not a good idea to improve Internet access.
What can be concluded from the aforementioned reasons and examples is that, thus, it is more vital to provide government funding to enhance public transportation than to enhance Internet access. It is obvious that public transportation is much more significant for all citizens in their daily life than the internet is.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'elders'' or 'elder's'?
Suggestion: elders'; elder's
...ion plays a much more vital role in the elders life than the internet does. Although t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...and commuting will be a difficult task. All of the residents, regardless of their age, use...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08478802993 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96243817657 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476309226933 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2885066765 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0952380952 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0952380952 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.45110844103 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347462546174 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102052543704 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720904801354 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202860393328 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651349230336 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.