Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
A glance at people's attitudes toward communication methods brings the light a question that has been asked several times, that is, whether communicating in person is better than communicating by e-mail. Although some people assert that sending e-mail is much more convenient than disguising in person, I am against this idea and believe that working face to face to more efficient.
The foremost reason why I am supporting this idea lies in the fact that it is easier to understand the information discussed in person. To be more specific, people need to organize their e-mail and disguise what should be mentioned in the e-mail. However, when people communicate face to face, they can just say everything they think without organizing it since people can understand it. For example, one time when I worked on a group project, even though I did not organize well in the idea I claimed, my group member can still understand it through my body language and gestures.
Another subtle point I should deem is the fact that messages, such as e-mail, will be ignored easily. To delineate, there are plenty of messages sent to people in a single day. Since people will not check all of them carefully, some of them will be ignored. Nevertheless, when it comes to communicating in person, it is hard for people to ignore what others are saying and people pay more attention to the discussion. For instance, communicating face to face makes me more concentrated on working on projects since I need to respond immediately to the discussion.
Last but not least, communicating in person takes less time than communicating by e-mail. To illustrate, people should take time to read and return messages, while they can respond to other members immediately when discussing face-to-face. Therefore, it is more efficient to communicate in person.
What can be concluded from the aforementioned reasons and examples is that, thus, communicating in person instead of e-mail will produce better and more efficient work for the project. Discussing face to face can make people more focused on the topic and information can be easily understood.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 351, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'face to'.
Suggestion: face to
...inst this idea and believe that working face to face to more efficient. The foremost reason...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'peoples'?
Suggestion: peoples
... they think without organizing it since people can understand it. For example, one tim...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08262108262 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92280478343 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509971509972 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5229375588 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216189639273 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084492628872 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731587092616 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141868620497 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325193919348 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.