Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The way that governments exploit their budget has always been of great controversy throughout the world. One of the predominant expenses that governments face is public transportation. Tax-payers have high expectations regarding this matter and that is why executives have always paid great attention to it. Recently, with the advent of technology and widespread use of the internet, many societies have asked the governments to facilitate internet access in the cities, villages and even in remote areas. This has created additional expense for the officials to set a percentage of taxes for rendering internet access to the public. Interestingly, some hold the opinion that it is even more crucial for governments to spend money for the improvement of internet access than renewing and improving public transportation. Although this notion has gained some popularity with the youngsters, I believe that it is not accurate. In what follows, I will discuss my justifications.
First, one has to consider all the age groups that exploit a certain service the government provides. Practically every single person in a society, from young school children to the elderly, uses public transportation system at some point; However, the range of the internet users is somewhat limited to young people and adults. Older people and adolescents do not surf the net. Many do not even possess computers and cellphones. For supporting evidence, one need to look no further than their own relatives; Young kids who still have not learnt how to read and old people with reduced eyesight are not into technology that much. Hence, It is logical to say that when a larger proportion of people uses a certain public equipment, more money should be spent for its development and advancement.
Moreover, many people have access to internet at their homes and offices. Many public places like airports, libraries and museums render free Wi-Fi. So, even if governments do not set money apart for providing access to internet, people will be fine. However, this is not the case for public transportation. Not everyone can afford to buy personal automobiles or pay taxi fares; And even if they could, increased use of personal cars could lead to more traffic, noise and pollution. Thus, it is safe to assume that a lack of competent public transport system can disturb the daily lives of people; Whereas the lack of public internet access would not be as disastrous.
In closing, by taking all the aforementioned reasons into account, one can conclude that more budget should be spent on the improvement of public transportation compared to internet access.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, still, thus, whereas, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2218.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20657276995 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91875332731 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530516431925 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 688.5 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.583417752 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.9 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319627188689 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932495426154 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884344684925 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195646491455 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05465851812 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.