Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Aspects that government should invest in has been an appealing topic. Numerous people over the world state that government should spend more money to enhance Internet access than to improve public transportation. Personally, I disagree with this statement.
On one hand, economic effectiveness draws much of my attention. It is well noted that investing in public transportation creates chances for the government to improve facilities and qualities of their transportation services. Therefore, it is possible for the government to encourage people to travel by public vehicles, which bring back to the government budget a lot of money. Take my location as an example, my local government has upgraded public transportation services and made more path of transportation in order to improve public vehicles net. After five years of the enhancement, the government has stated that the amount of money that the government earned from public transportation has increased ten times, comparing to the figure before this process has been applied. Even better, my local government has also confirmed that money earned from public transportation has been invested in some other aspects that improve my location economy efficiency. More interesting, upgrading public transportation is sure to contribute to location representation. Indeed, enhancing transportation encourage people to think this location is an innovative city or town. Thus, improving transportation is improving tourism of that city. By and large, upgrading public vehicles and services brings back to the government a lot of economy effectiveness.
On the other hand, it is claimed that investing in public transportation cost a lot of money of government. Hence, people's life qualities are likely to be decreased. However, it is unnecessarily the case. In fact, the government's fund is not only the source of money that invest in public vehicles. There are other companies which spend money on some aspects such as advertisement on vehicles or services in stations. As a result, the government is not likely to allocate much money to upgrade the public transportation services. In addition, there is a likelihood that people tend to use public transportation instead of personal vehicles because public vehicles cost less money and comfortable for all customers. Accordingly, the amount of time that personal vehicles in use is certain to be decreased, which reduce the number of emissions from personal vehicles in the atmosphere. Therefore, the air is likely to cleaner, even better, the environment is certain to be protected. Thus, people stand a golden chance to become healthier. With no doubt, the idea of investing in public transportation decreases life qualities is absurd.
All in all, economy effectiveness and life quality improvement are the convincing reasons for my agreement. It is highly recommended people that should carefully consider my writing before making the right decision on choosing an aspect to invest in.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in fact, no doubt, such as, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 40.0 8.0752688172 495% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2536.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47732181425 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21012234988 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442764578834 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 802.8 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.0643214254 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5384615385 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8076923077 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247625883072 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773040025057 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733717366139 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17527649765 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0943242290789 0.0645574589148 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.