Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own than by people whose views are different from yours.
By and large, news and media has recently become the focus of the increased attention across the globe. It is owing to the fact that news play a vital role in people's lives as they can improve their awareness of their surroundings. Some people believe that pursuing new by people whose views are close to them is a better approach while other people holds the opposite idea. Personally speaking, I think chasing opposite views is more important, and in the ensuing lines, I will delve to substantiate my point.
The first reason is that reading and watching news from opposite views help people to be objective. As people with the same mind sets gather together, they usually endorse each other and augment views they held which lead them to be biased. Hence, they cannot think and act unbiased that could hurt them by making irrational decisions with severe ramifications. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was working at an investment company, I was responsible for buying and selling stocks. As I read and follow limited channels that had a same views to my own, seldom did I watch another channels that held another view. After a while, I made a horrible mistake in my investment, which was really a naive investment. Hadn't I ignore the other channels, I would have made a better decision and gain a lot of profit instead.
Second, by chasing contrary news, people can challenge the strength of their current views. If people read and watch restricted news, they will never have a chance to correct and improve their views. Seeing news challenging people current views, provide them the opportunity to examine their assumptions and inferences which lead them to be in the right position. For example, we have to political parties in our country having opposite views about a plethora of issues. As my parents, followed the Right party, I followed them too. We just saw and talked about our party and our achievements, until one of my friends demanded our views and caused I learn to think out of the box after that.
In summary, all the aforementioned reasons bring us to the conclusion that following news provided by opposite views is a superior options. Not only does it help people to be more objective, but also they can test their assumptions and grounds.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-06 | theprasad | 70 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | ShayesteTR | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-12 | JoeyRussell07 | 90 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | JoeyRussell07 | 90 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | JoeyRussell07 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement We can learn more from people at a higher level than us like teachers than from people who are at the same level as us 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 92
- TOEFL TPO 45 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 735, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Hadn't
...t, which was really a naive investment. Hadnt I ignore the other channels, I would ha...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, really, second, so, while, for example, i think, in summary, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1906.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8253164557 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59286240032 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544303797468 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4697646636 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.3 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271274193115 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812610347387 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708592750673 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170340520349 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324220548435 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.