Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more interesting to read a good book or see a good movie the second time than the first. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Books and movies are a good way to keep me entertain they offer wonderful hobbies. I like to find an interesting DVD and just sit back and enjoy it. Although some people would agree that watching a movie or reading a book the second time is more interesting I would disagree with that statement.
Experiencing a story in the big screen for the first time is exciting. The suspense of not knowing what is going to happen next and not been aware of how things will be presented is part of the reason I watch movies. Even if I am familiar with the plot and the events of a movie I go and look at the film to see how it's interpreted by the production. But watching the same movie twice is boring. I say this because I know exactly what is going to happen and how the director will represent it. For example I was happy when the new Aladdin came out, especially because it was not animated. Even though it was the same plot as the original the producers added characters and changed some things. Furthermore if I would see this movie for a second time I would know what happens next and I would just be expecting the next scene without any excitement.
Watching a movie once is always better than watching a movie for the second time. Although I sometimes like to watch the same movie over and over, it's not like watching it for the first time. I know what is going to happen and I will most likely skip through the parts of the movie I didn't like or that I thought were boring.
In conclusion it is always more interesting to watch a movie for the first time than to watch the same movie two times. The first time is exciting and I do not know what is going to happen next.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 702, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ed characters and changed some things. Furthermore if I would see this movie for a second ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 287, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...y skip through the parts of the movie I didnt like or that I thought were boring. ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dnt like or that I thought were boring. In conclusion it is always more interest...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, look, second, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1977.66487455 69% => OK
No of words: 319.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.29153605016 4.8611393121 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33129803357 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457680250784 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 426.6 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9241655138 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5625 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235199202409 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832524879602 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796223685489 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176694247031 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083468629259 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 58.1214874552 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.6 10.9000537634 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.51 8.01818996416 81% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 86.8835125448 45% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.