Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is a waste of money for government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is a waste of money for government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.

It is obvious that in today's fast-paced world it is important for governments to make investment in carrying out the projects related to space travel or space exploration which has significant effects on humans' future life. Although some people assert that it a waste of money and governments should spend their budget on other important purposes, I strongly believe that governments should try to explore space and allocate some of their money for this goal which will ne beneficial for humanity. In the following paragraphs, I will discuss my view usinf some reasons and examples.
I believe that nowadays, increase in humans' populations who live on the earth will cause people to be faced many problems and difficulties regarding required space for living in the future. As a result, scientists and research institutions need to be supported by governments financially in order to have access to advanced equipment to do a lot of research on space. It will help them to know many thing about space. For example, recently, I read a paper about an important discovery that researchers have been able to achieve. They have found out that it is possible that there are planets which have water; hence, future generation will be able to live on other planets.
Moreover, I believe that the source and origin of many problems that we suffer from on the Earth are related to space. One of these events is sudden climatic changes which has negative and destructive impacts on living organisms' life. Consequently, if they governments fund the space travel, it will lead astronauts to find the causes of these occurrences and to make efforts to find the best solution to eliminate this problem. Without spending money on these space exploration, they cannot solve many problems and save the Earth.
To sum up, in my point of view, even though societies can spend this money to solve many problems which today people encounter, I think governments also pay attention to future generations because that have the right to live. As a mater of fact, it is government's duty to assign a certain budget to explore space in order to resolve a lot of problems.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-15 hamiddelbari 90 view
2019-08-05 negar.sh 76 view
2019-05-08 aliasghar 76 view
2019-02-15 persepolistmm 70 view
2018-10-22 SHAHRIYAR 70 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing
Essays by user zabanenglish :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 394, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'many things'.
Suggestion: many things
...rch on space. It will help them to know many thing about space. For example, recently, I r...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organisms'' or 'organism's'?
Suggestion: organisms'; organism's
...ative and destructive impacts on living organisms life. Consequently, if they governments...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Consequently, if they governments fund the space travel, it will lead astronaut...
^^
Line 4, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in order to resolve a lot of problems.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, for example, i think, as a result, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9364640884 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72310824592 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513812154696 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.7006707424 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.642857143 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220294908118 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779789533148 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526930350935 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133855683736 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447567615021 0.0645574589148 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.