Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Some people believe that leadership is the instict quality and one can not learn it. However, I disagree with the given statement and believe that in the 21st-century after learning leadership qualities, one can become a successful leader for the following reasons.

First of all, trough improving communication and educational skills, one can become a good leader. To be a leader, one must have to communicate with others to get things done. Therefore, anyone can become a leader who has a powerful communication expertise. For example, in every business organization, there are a positions of leader, and human resource officials hire this leadership personnel based on their skills such as, communication, teamwork skills, educational background etc. On the other hand, if a person has a natural leadership skill but not any educational qualifications, he/she can not be hired in the business organization. Hence, it is obvious that leadership skills can be learned and practiced.

Secondly, experience plays a vital role to become a leader. Practicing leadership roles with the passage of time, one can be the effective leaders of the country. For example, political powerful leader can not become this position naturally. They have to practice leadership role throughout the life time. For example, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman was the successful political leader of Bangladesh. He never reached this position overnight. He had to struhggle a lot and went to the jail several times while was working as the assistance of a political leader. With time, he abled to generate leadership qualities and now people considered him a good leader. In contrast, I noticed some people who claimed that they had natural leadership skills and undertook the nations responsibilities and their lack of experience turned the whole country to the hell. They made the people's lives distressful and economy of the country fell into disaster. A recent study of Newyork City university has showed that ninty percent of leaders is learned their leadership skills throughout their whole life.

In conclusion, it can state that one can learn the necessary skills such as communication skills, educations, teamwork skills, and gather experience to become a leader.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a position' or simply 'positions'?
Suggestion: a position; positions
... every business organization, there are a positions of leader, and human resource officials...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...practice leadership role throughout the life time. For example, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman was...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 501, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and went to the jail several times while was working as the assistance of a polit...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36543909348 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01752246421 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504249291785 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.6020160881 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.65 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.65 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214550017817 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771389504008 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598591032344 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150562204756 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566154848681 0.0645574589148 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.