Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, No one can cast doubt on the leading a group, company, system, and so on has a paramount significance in the success of a community; the leadership courses are quite becoming trendy among the academic place such as universities, college, and private academic places; It is my empathetic belief that not without learn a specific course and receive such experience, no person can be a leader, at least good leader. If I were asked to determine a couple of reasons standing behind my points of view, I would strongly suggest the leaders who became strong leaders by means of both the learning and the experience of the perfect leadership process into society and own family. I will manifest my reasons in the subsequent paragraphs.
It is without an adumbration of doubt the being a natural leadership notwithstanding, the person requires a more sophistication upon details, handling in the perplexing situation. not only is it a tough and burdensome but demands it more exercise in management approach; Hence, these approaches are obtained by learning from professors regarding management and leadership such as MBA. My personal experience is compelling evidence of what I mean; when I was working in the automotive sector in L.A, I have seen different people in the head of the company, the leadership thereof, they were talented people naturally; rather, this position require learning in specific details in order to the person would be more professional leadership, they failed to achieve to such level, thereby passing this position to another leader.
It also goes without declaring that the experience gradually goes people to the apogee of leadership gradually; The process of experience after learning the procedure of management plays a vital role in the success of leaders. To be more specific, the genius president of the United state carried out a diversity of role in politics and got such an experiment to reach the place of the presidency; if he did not need any experience, he would work in a restaurant now.
It can be summed up in accentuating that leadership does not come naturally; rather, one can learn to be a leader. My personal belief is humans require learning since the earlier stage of life, and management is the same as human being required to learn and education to be a fertile ground to success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p notwithstanding, the person requires a more sophistication upon details, handli...
^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Not
..., handling in the perplexing situation. not only is it a tough and burdensome but d...
^^^
Line 3, column 498, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...s working in the automotive sector in L.A, I have seen different people in the he...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, regarding, so, at least, i mean, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04370179949 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95597405175 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521850899743 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 20.1344086022 189% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 114.076465583 48.9658058833 233% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 196.2 100.406767564 195% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.9 20.6045352989 189% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197298868686 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845982788303 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512328937573 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124829910622 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536732952797 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.8 11.7677419355 185% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.91 58.1214874552 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.1575268817 178% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.5 10.002688172 285% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.0537634409 171% => OK
text_standard: 29.0 10.247311828 283% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.