Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In our contemporary world, technological advancements have led to developement of industrial production at a rapid pace. With the advent of internet, technology has complexed human work station runs, and it has convoluted our minds. Thus, it is of paramount importance to have a genuine leader and not a dictator to maintain a healthy working relation with our colleagues, which will eventually reflect on the company reputation. Therefore, some people wonder if the leadership quality is instinctive or one must develop it with time ? In my opinion, the quality of a great leader is instinctive, and it cannot be acquired with time and experience. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate three main reasons to support my belief, on the most outstanding and cogent grounds.
First and foremost, for the prosperity of a company, it is of paramount importance that every human being play their role deligently and with passion. Amongst them, a leader is the sole runner of the show. He must possess sheer genuineness and interest towards the company and its projects. The immense dedication and affection towards the work must come naturally. Therefore, it cannot be acquired. For instance, I feel blissful to work in my dream company, as each day is an exciting day, and all the credit goes to my leader who is a role model to all the employees because of his leadership qualities.
Next, it is my ardent belief that the feeling of selflessness cannot be acquired over time. The characterestic of keeping the fellow workers as the priority and selflessly dedicating oneself is the most important quality of a true leader. For example, my father is considered as a symbol of true leader in our society. He was a bank manager, who always had room for every employee, any time of the day. He was often found to enter the premise first and the last person to leave. He spent most of his free time communicating and conversing with the fellow colleagues, and never shy away from helping the people in need.
Finally, one must explicitly distinguish between a real leader and a dictator. The quality of a dictator can be inculcated with time and experience. Such people are often found to be exploiting their position, and dominate over the fellow employees. As a result, they cannot hold on to the position for a long time, rather their fall is inevitable. On the other hand, many successful leaders, for instance, Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, etc. they start their career from the scratch. Therefore, such people are highly empathetic and modest, and therefore, the society looks up to them respectfully.
To sum up, in the pressing need to simplify our chaotic work life, we need a true leader to guide us through the process, and eventually climb the ladder of success. However, the true quality of a leader is inherent and it cannot be acquired. Such noble people are always found to be genuine, selfless, and modest, compared to a dictator who is often seen to exploit his designation to benefit himself.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ise first and the last person to leave. He spent most of his free time communicati...
^^
Line 5, column 549, Rule ID: FELLOW_CLASSMATE[1]
Message: Use simply 'colleagues'.
Suggestion: colleagues
...e communicating and conversing with the fellow colleagues, and never shy away from helping the pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i feel, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2509.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 509.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92927308448 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8450764178 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504911591356 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 785.7 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0357446292 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6071428571 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1785714286 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159434474452 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464728917942 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419339908191 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920338431894 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333339994906 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.