Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Some people believe that in ancient time, life was simple and easier because people had less stress on career, personal life and they were more straight forward. However, I disagree with the given statement, and think that people's lives in the 21st century are more easier and comfortable than the time of my grandparents were children for the following reasons.

First of all, technological development helps people to do the tasks in a more easy and comfy way. Now, people use airconditioner, washing machines, oven, heating system, internet, and satellite tv. All of these have a significant impact on people. For example, I use oven and cook within 10-20 mintues, and sometimes I take help of youtube for reciepe. However, when my grandparents were children, it would quite impossible, and they took more than 4 hours to cook food. Because that time there were no electric equipments to cook. Therefore, I feel that our life is much easy-going than them. Whenever, I first came USA, I did not know how to cook, but with the help of youtube, now I cook more than 20 items, and all are very tasty. These way, technology makes people life trouble free and calm.

Secondly, in today's globalized world, people can buy anything from anywhere. In contrast, in earlier times, there were no available market, shopping mall, grocery store, and they had to do many hardships for collecting food,and clothes. Even, they had to go somewhere on foot, which took much time. For instance, from Bangladesh, I buy American or Europian products through Amazon. On the other hand, earlier times my grandparents could not buy the product of another cities within the same country. Even, business people now can meet with many clients in different countries whinin a day, in primitive period, people took one or more years to move one country to another. Hence, people now enjoy many facilities that make their life more peaceful.

In conclusion, it can be said that modern equipment, and globalization makes people way of life less complex, and more convenient.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...with the given statement, and think that peoples lives in the 21st century are mo...
^^
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
... peoples lives in the 21st century are more easier and comfortable than the time of my gra...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ey took more than 4 hours to cook food. Because that time there were no electric equipm...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 737, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this way' or 'These ways'?
Suggestion: This way; These ways
... than 20 items, and all are very tasty. These way, technology makes people life trouble f...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...to do many hardships for collecting food,and clothes. Even, they had to go somewhere...
^^^^
Line 5, column 680, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to move one country to another. Hence, people now enjoy many facilities that ma...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98833819242 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62487186655 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597667638484 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.86738351254 536% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9360795277 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0526315789 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0526315789 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36842105263 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203825788027 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605679977775 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671125244641 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132074038599 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854842551215 0.0645574589148 132% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.