Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important investment of a company is to improve the skills of its employees.
As I am interested in business when I was in the junior high school, I used to wonder how those big companies get to succeed. After growing older, I think if a company wants to be successful, not only the leader of the company need to be powerful, but also the skills of some vital techniques need to be learned well by their employees.
First of all, as the old saying goes, the basis decides the height of the building. Employees are people who do most of the basic but practical work, such as hunting people who are in another company, doing experiments to develop a new product, or just providing services for the customers. For instance, why is the Starbucks so popular? I think the flavor of their coffee and those method they use to engage the trade is important, but the most basic part of their success is actually those stuff who make coffee by hands and offer coffee to their customers. According to the research, Starbucks spend a large amount of money on cultivating stuffs, in order to ensure their skill is enough to match the grand.
Secondly, those successful companies also need new blood, otherwise they will be replaced by other companies with new fashion trend. Thus, it is significant to let their employees grasp the known skills, only when they learn old skills well, they have the ability to improve them, which makes those skills better, and also ensure they are good enough to compete with other companies.
To sum up, because the skill is the soul and the employees are the basis of a company, it is certainly the most essential investment for a company to improve the skills of its employees. And only after the improvement, companies will be capable enough to compete with others in this changeable world.
Comments
i don't know how to develop
i don't know how to develop my viewpoints effectively
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to well'
Suggestion: to well
...ome vital techniques need to be learned well by their employees. First of...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e learned well by their employees. First of all, as the old saying goes, th...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this method' or 'those methods'?
Suggestion: this method; those methods
... I think the flavor of their coffee and those method they use to engage the trade is importa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...r of their coffee and those method they use to engage the trade is important, but t...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill is enough to match the grand. Secondly, those successful companies als...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to compete with other companies. To sum up, because the skill is the soul...
^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...with others in this changeable world.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance, i think, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 306.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73202614379 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49596410529 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52614379085 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.4714262146 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.636363636 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8181818182 20.6045352989 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.45110844103 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203773462937 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748020348456 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811027811466 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139726680679 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084436727492 0.0645574589148 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 58.1214874552 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.