Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: The most important problems affecting our society today could be solved within our lifetime.
In the sophisticated today’s world where we live, human beings encounter so many problems. Many of these problems affect some important aspects of people’s life. In this regard, some people think they can get these problems solved during their life. Others, on the other hand, believe that it is less likely to get rid of these problems over their lifetime. I, for one, concur with the latter group for two conspicuous reasons that I will elaborate on in the following paragraphs.
One of the most obvious reasons that comes to mind is that in our progressive world administrators and practitioners pay all their attention to making money and do not care about the general public’s benefits. To put it in another word, governments around the world are not responsible for the fate of human beings, and they prioritize their own advantageous. Take global warming, one of the serious problems of today’s world, as an example. The new generation expects governments in to pass laws and do some practical activities in order to decrease the rate of global warming. However, because of the huge financial benefits which fossil fuels provide, they do not cut down using them. In such circumstances, we cannot be optimistic about addressing the global warming problem during our lifetime.
Another exquisite reason is that most people around the world are reluctant to do voluntary activities which are conducive in making a well-being society. Although there are many people who do philanthropic activities, most people think about their own desires and do nothing to improve the situation of their society. To illustrate, in every corner of the globe there are many underprivileged persons that live in bad conditions; they do not access to enough food, proper medicine, and school to name but a few. On the other hand, most of the wealthy ones think only about luxury possessions such as expensive cars, big house, and expensive trips. In such a situation, social gaps will increasingly grow between poor and rich. So, I think we cannot expect poverty will be managed in society because people do not care about each other’s life.
In conclusion, having the two mentioned reasons into account, I firmly believe that the most crucial problems of our world like global warming and poverty cannot be solved during our lifetime. In our world, not only do governments sacrifice the public’s benefits for their own benefits, but also people are not sensitive about each other’s life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 184, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... making money and do not care about the general public’s benefits. To put it in another word, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2082.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09046454768 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74981678285 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508557457213 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9428261754 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.578947368 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5263157895 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42105263158 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214232722155 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668434855625 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483666220234 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142325779701 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357860499776 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.