Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies are worth watching only when they teach something about real life.
In this progressive-hectic world where we live which confronting people with a vast amount of stress, all humans are in search of distinctive ways as to relieve their tension. By considering this in mind, movies obviously take the significant place among other kinds of entertainment. Regarding this issue, some people believe that only movies that contain real information are meriting to watch, while others are of the belief that no matter what the genre it is, in any case watching them is invaluable. As far as I am concerned, I hold the opinion of the latter group and in the ensuing paragraph, I will delve into some conspicuous aspects of the issue.
First and foremost, as time marches on most people have a fresh look at the movies and do not consider it as merely a source of learning about different fields like real life. To put it in general words, benefits of watching movies even if those do not give real data, outweigh of its disadvantageous. It is crystal clear that modern human who tolerates much pressure imposing by stressful lifestyle; need to equip himself/herself with refreshing mechanisms that can be included movies. Therefore, recovering mechanisms of the movies have more benefits than their learning purposes. To clarify let's have an example. As I am an extroverted person, I would like to watch comedy movies in the presence of others in the cinema since their laughing makes me laugh. It is completely true that comedy films compromise unreal and absurd aspects but their presence is really necessary due to the fact that they help us to detach from daily stress.
Alongside the first reason elaborated above, the movies offering unreal and imaginary contents learn us many noteworthy lessons which cannot be conveyed through real movies. In other words, science fiction movies which display fictional matters, get people familiar with the creative minds and ideas of the writer and director. This way, spectator acquires knowledge of things that probably at this time are unrealistic and abstract but in the near future, it is possible to take place. For instance, although the ideas of the Wright brothers about flying seemed erratic and unrealistic at that period of time, now it has become real, by the same token, the fictional movies that are made in today's world; might be become real.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons, watching movies containing unreal affairs is worthy as not only do they help people to release their stress, but also assist them to gain knowledge about novel ideas that might be become true in the near future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 595, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... seemed erratic and unrealistic at that period of time, now it has become real, by the same to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, really, regarding, so, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in general, in any case, in other words, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2168.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98390804598 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69709747444 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570114942529 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.7214180532 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.5 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1875 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.45110844103 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199012924229 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604093734066 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509845526386 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12292312193 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027150194396 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.