Money is an powerful tool in todays world. It can be used either in constructive or destructive purpose. People are spending money for their pets for various reasons. They are considered a part of human family and treat them as one of their siblings. I strongly agree with the fact people are spending too much money on their pets although they can use the money in useful way with three reasons. To elaborate one has to go through scrupulous discussion below.
Firstly, people are considering the breed of their pet as a status symbol. In the market Labrador and Golden retriever are sold at recording high rates. For instance, there is celebrity named Samantha wanted a dog of breed pit bull which is not easily available here so she asked the management to import the breed for which she paid a handsome amount instead she could have bought a home for the local dogs which are homeless and provide food for the malnutritional dogs.
In addition, these domestic animals are provided with external and luxurious facilities like massages and grooming for every one or two weeks period. There are many kinds of food and clothes that are manufactured for the dogs and cats especially. People those could afford are purchasing such costly items just to make them look beautiful. There are wide variety of chains and pet homes that are more expensive than the normal meal a person could afford. The amount of money spent can be channeled for a better use like adopting a large number of pets and provide food for them to survive.
Furthermore, there are lack of hospitals and veterinary doctors in many cities for the rare breed. So, this is becoming more difficult for the pet owners to treat them during sick times which in turn leading to spend enumerate money on doctor fee and the medicines. For instance, a crazy pet owner even travelled abroad with all the ticket fee for flights and the treatment when his pet had fallen sick. Instead they could donate the amount for charity which would help amply people around and could improve their condition.
To conclude, many will argue that they are spending money nevertheless the presence of pet so, instead they are spending on them. It is good to some extent but these days people have crossed the limits which could be utilized in more positive terms. So, pampering or looking after a pet within the amount limit is healthy and the remaining excess amount can be donated to children in need or the old age homes for a greater society.
In today's society, the…
In today's society, the growing trend of people investing significant amounts of money in their pets, be it dogs, cats, or other furry companions, is undeniable. While some may argue that these expenditures could be directed towards more practical or essential needs, it's essential to recognize that the decision to splurge on our pets is a personal one, shaped by individual values and priorities.
Visit Your URL
see this website
visit this page
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
Money is an powerful tool in todays world. It can b...
^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...hanneled for a better use like adopting a large number of pets and provide food for them to survi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 404, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...treatment when his pet had fallen sick. Instead they could donate the amount for charit...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, so, as to, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2056.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73732718894 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38645615303 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541474654378 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1202522261 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9047619048 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47619047619 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339693476883 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10030653601 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980731459664 0.0737576698707 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191499391494 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861406137987 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.