Nowadays, with the spead of life incresing significantly, people are trying to find a quicker way to distinguish what kind of people a person is by observing his or her friends. Many people think that one's friends are good indications for judgement. Nevertheless, from my perspective, one cannot learn much about a person from the type of friends this person has.
First, it is difficult somtimes to control what kind of people to be friends with. Especially when we are working or studying with others, we are forced to make friends with our classmates or colleges even it gose against our intention. My friend Marry, for instance, worked at a food shop on campus last year. While she was working, she met with another students, Ann, who was also an employee there. Unlike Marry, who is kind and warm-hearted, Ann is a mean girl who enjoys to talk ill things about other students and professors behind their backs. Friendly as Marry is, she was not willing to make friend with Ann. However, Ann was eager to know Marry and followed everywhere Marry went. Fianlly, Marry had to introduce Ann to others as her friend. It is obvious that Marry and Ann are totally different people, and it would not be fair if Marry were to be regarded as the same people as Ann is. As a result, I argue that one can hardly know anything of a person from people around him or her.
In addition, people tend to have many types of friends, making it impossible to tell exacty what kind of people a person is. Out of many people's expectation, friends with contrary personality could be close too. For example, my roomate and I have a really good relationship with each other, despect the fact that we have different character. My roomate, Betty, who is crious about the word, masters many skills, such as painting, singing, and even making small films. Nonetheless, she is a lazy student, who are happy to pass a class with a low GPA. On the contray, I am a hard-working type, but also rigid and boring at the same time. These difference never influence our friendship since we became friend three years ago. We now still eat together, go to class together, and sometimes go to movies together. In this case, her personality is never a good indicatior of mine. Consequently, I disagree with the idea that one can learn a lot from the type of friends this person has.
Admittedly, people who are similar to each other tend to be friends. However, these kind of a friends could only consist a small partion of all the friends a person could have. Therefore, it would be rediculars to tell a person from his or her friends.
In summary, based on the reasoning above, I support the idea that one cannot learn a lot about a person from the type of friends this person has.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...each other tend to be friends. However, these kind of a friends could only consist a small...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
...ther tend to be friends. However, these kind of a friends could only consist a small part...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a friend' or simply 'friends'?
Suggestion: a friend; friends
...d to be friends. However, these kind of a friends could only consist a small partion of a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, really, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in summary, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2267.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 491.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61710794297 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56295175841 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49083503055 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 693.9 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6536035434 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.962962963 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1851851852 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.03703703704 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367064766103 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114076780141 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154291824671 0.0737576698707 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273322426787 0.150856017488 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126492545873 0.0645574589148 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.