Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? One should never judge a person by external appearances. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
Exterior aspect has always been an important matter for humans beings. Beauty, mood, clothes and other ornaments that people use, can be a reason for prejudgment. I agree that no one should be judged by external appearances. In the next essay, I will give arguments that supports this statement.
To start with, I am against to those who consider that the clothes make the man. Unfortunately, financial equality is not a characteristic of today's realities. There are rich people who can afford luxurious items, and person who can barely survive to daily life. Having a big fortune does not mean that rich guys possess a good soul or behavior. Most of times, they are selfish, arrogant and treat the others with superiority. When I was in college, I went out with my friend and her wealthy acquaintances. One sweet girl said her car was broken and that she had to go to work by tram. You could have noticed in her voice that she considered means of public transport something beyond her status. Since I have no personal car, it made me feel uncomfortable and I have never gone out with them once again. I am sure that this attitude might not be available for all the moneyed individuals, but for sure this is good example that things are not always what they seem to be.
Secondly, somebody can be misjudged because of her/his personality. There are people who are like an open book and expose their feelings. On the other hand, some individuals have a poker face. Those from the latter category are perceived as being cold and insensitive. In high school I had a music professor, and during four years I had never seen him smiling. He was always austere, severe, giving the impression of a serial killer. A few years after graduating high school, I had the chance to meet him in an friendly environment. This time I saw him smiling, joking, having a normal behavior and being a pleasant person. I dared to ask him why he was so different in the class and he said that it is a way to make students respect and listen to you.
These being said, I strongly believe that each of us should be more careful when deciding about someones personality, based only on external aspect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: HUMANS_BEINGS[2]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean: 'human beings'?
Suggestion: human beings
...has always been an important matter for humans beings. Beauty, mood, clothes and other orname...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the times') or simply say ''Most times''.
Suggestion: Most of the times; Most times
...h guys possess a good soul or behavior. Most of times, they are selfish, arrogant and treat t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: SAY_TELL[2]
Message: 'Say' cannot be followed by a direct personal object. Did you mean 'told'?
Suggestion: told
...r wealthy acquaintances. One sweet girl said her car was broken and that she had to ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 509, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...school, I had the chance to meet him in an friendly environment. This time I saw h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64082687339 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61879644099 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612403100775 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.4243876729 48.9658058833 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.8333333333 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.125 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.45110844103 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134958094283 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369604389865 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642132215068 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0906543290124 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695306362387 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 11.7677419355 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.