Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Correct information regarding anything is very important for acquiring proper knowledge and using it in future activities. Personally, I believe that we should consult different news resources to make sure that information we received is correct or not. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in following essay.
To begin with, there are many online news websites or journals which are run by people who don’t have enough experience to provide correct news. Every new channel or website, today is running a race for providing news as fast as possible. As a result, the information shared by these sources can be sometime not properly analyzed or authorized. Many times, we find that they lack the experience in creating or providing the appropriate news. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Four years ago, I was working on a project to evaluate the impact of elections on our general public at that time. I went through few of online articles which showed interviews of white collar people who were very appreciative of the new government and its ideas of improving the economic growth of the country. I formed it as the main opinion of general public and found out that my supervisor is of the opinion that information regarding general idea of people is incorrect and I just emphasized my notes on few of elites whereas our democracy consisted of mainly the middle class and other people. This depicts that if I would have consulted other sites or paper newspapers I would not have missed the opinion of major members of our society.
Secondly, correct news is important to make sure that you know what you are talking about if you go for a discussion on that specific news. These days’ people have huge discussion on every news we see on our TV sets or in paper newspaper. It is absolutely great to be part of those discussion and show your interest in discussion about those issues or topics. We make sure that you have proper participation who need to be sure that authenticity of news is correct and you will not be embarrassed by saying something incorrect. For example, when we co-workers were having a discussion about the current policy on immigration, one of our colleague suggested that he is in favor of that policy without considering the policy we are talking about. Later, when we asked details to confirm that is he really aware of that information, he was quiet and was embarrassed that he just posited his opinion without knowing what he saying about.
In conclusion, I believe that we should look out several news resource to assure that we have right information. This is because there are several online news resources whose information cannot be authenticated, and because correct news is important to make sure you are confident regarding what you are talking about.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 585, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...evaluate the impact of elections on our general public at that time. I went through few of onl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 846, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...try. I formed it as the main opinion of general public and found out that my supervisor is of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1123, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had consulted'?
Suggestion: had consulted
...nd other people. This depicts that if I would have consulted other sites or paper newspapers I would...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 282, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this discussion' or 'those discussions'?
Suggestion: this discussion; those discussions
...r. It is absolutely great to be part of those discussion and show your interest in discussion ab...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 926, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'saith', 'says'.
Suggestion: saith; says
...ted his opinion without knowing what he saying about. In conclusion, I believe th...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 50, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun news seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some news'.
Suggestion: some news
...sion, I believe that we should look out several news resource to assure that we have right i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, really, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, for example, i feel, in conclusion, talking about, you know, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 27.0 11.0286738351 245% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 73.0 43.0788530466 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2365.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 483.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89648033126 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76416978091 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474120082816 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 767.7 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6712904549 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.15 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.65 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137811914083 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466509705515 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415171850318 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908153094579 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00966749362586 0.0645574589148 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.