Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It goes without saying that in today’s progressive world where we live, human being is exposed to diverse assortments of events and occurrences, each of which being covered with mass media. However, people are faced with the dilemma of whether to be dependent on one or various news resources in order to be well-informed. Personally speaking, I hold the view that a person must get information from different sources, not just merely rely on one news resource. The reasons to substantiate my viewpoint are elaborated upon in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, it is crystal clear that with the advancement of the world and the accentuated ebbs and flows of different aspects of humans’ lives like the economical, social, scientific and cultural perspectives, to name but a few, individuals’ thirst to gain more information about all the occurrences around the globe has also increased. To quench this thirst in people, they are provided with various news resources such as CNN, BBC, NYT, social networking, newspaper, and the like. In this vein, every individual will take advantage of being aware of a diverse set of perspectives being presented by various resources. Undeniably, each of these news resources analyzes the information on the basis of their own line of thought which in turn leads to a prejudiced and biased analysis. Being exposed to various resources, however, increase the opportunity for people to make a sound and reasonable understanding on the basis of their own critical thinking. To put it into a more vivid picture, during the presidential election in 2018, each of the news resources were inclined to highlight and direct their audience to one specific candidate. It is not surprising that if a person is confined solely to one news source, he or she will blindly and unconsciously get attracted to one candidate which may not be even the right choice. This was the case that happened to me in the previous election. Since I considered CNN as the most reliable source of news and did not even read the news from different sites, I mistakenly voted for Trump who has been ruining our country.
Furthermore, another equally important reason which should be mentioned is that knowing different perspectives from a variety of sources will positively affect people’s mind. To put it in other words, people will be more open to criticism and they will certainly become open-minded if being exposed to various sources. It is no secret to anyone that gaining information from various resources means that people will be provided with various thought which may be in favor or opposed to their own belief. Under such circumstances, they surely will learn to respect different opinion and analyze various beliefs so as to accept one of the most conspicuous ones later. For instance, every day I check various news resources to gain some information on events that have occurred around the world. Although some of which contradict my own belief, I learnt how to go along with various opinions and respect other’s opinion, as well.
In conclusion, having the aforementioned reasons into account, I firmly believe that gaining information from various sources is more beneficial for people to be well-aware because it will provide them different perspectives, moreover they can enhance their ability to be more open-minded in order to accept various opinions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 610, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ent opinion and analyze various beliefs so as to accept one of the most conspicuous ones...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 89.0 52.1666666667 171% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2842.0 1977.66487455 144% => OK
No of words: 554.0 407.700716846 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12996389892 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85151570047 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90418796886 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 283.0 212.727598566 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51083032491 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 882.0 618.680645161 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.9244867011 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.1 100.406767564 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261974482386 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868874336341 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566705729178 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190993989088 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595537314423 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 11.7677419355 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 86.8835125448 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.