Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Financial status has always played an important role in people living for more than decades. Some people believe children should not learn difficult processing as the financial planning is further than a young age, others believe managing money should be learned when they were young because this is a significant issue in life when they grow up. In my opinion, there are two reasons that youngsters should learn how to manipulate the financial for the future which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, saving money is a major cause in life that could assist people when they encounter an unexpected emergency. To be specific, children should be taught effectively planning money by parents and school. Due to the fact that children have never had to work, they might not realize how hard to earn income. They spend money by desirable without thinking, it would affect their life in the future. Besides, kids lack to understand how to spend money cautiously and manage efficiently. Had they not taught managing money when a young age, they would not be able to perceive valuable financial. Furthermore, they would not have money-saving to spend in the emergency. Hence, instructing about saving money when they are young would be able to affect them to know the value of money, Furthermore, this skill can support their life to be a professional saving planner when they grow up.
Secondly, learning financial savings when childhood could affect children to comprehend the financial status of their family. They might understand the parents and help them to save money. For instance, my friend's parent had trouble with finances because they owed the bank and need to pay the debt back to the bank within a month. The parent could not make a lot of money to pay the bank on time, my friend knew the situation and helped the parent by taking her money which she saved when she was young. As a result, the parent got sufficient money and paid back on time. Because of my friend's effort to save money when childhood, she could solve her parent's finances. Thus, children should learn about money management when they are young, it would be useful in the future.
In conclusion, it can be seen teaching children about financial planning would be able to assist them to be a professional saving planner. It also supports their life when they encounter an emergency situation in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I will explore in the following essay. To begin with, saving money is a major c...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onal saving planner when they grow up. Secondly, learning financial savings whe...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ung, it would be useful in the future. In conclusion, it can be seen teaching c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88780487805 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48693911287 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451219512195 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2962472662 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.2 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187774768228 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730138445083 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531906074789 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130666853121 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466339388324 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.