Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to succeed in doing a new job, the ability to adapt oneself to the new environment is more important than the excellent knowledge of this job.
Being successful in the job, as we all know, is a crucial part of life. Although it may seem exaggerated, at first sight, one may find this contention sensible. In this regard, some people support this opinion that in doing a new job, the ability to adapt to new circumstances is far essential than perfect knowledge. Contrary to popular belief, I believe that other factors such as experience and self-confidence are more vital than the adaptability. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The first reason which makes me hold this belief is the experience. Which reputed and famous company ignore the experience as a qualification? Undoubtedly, the perfect experiences of a qualified person will convey this message that she has other suitable abilities too. Thus, the psychological characteristics can stratify as a sub-category or dependent factor for success. Although there is no identified reliable personality test which indicates the influence of the adaptation ability feature on success, it is not rejected. In the higher level of a company based on psychological piece of evidence, whereas adaptability is a critical personality trait that distinguished top employees from each other, it is not sufficient, and other factors like networks can mediate it.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is self-confidence. Indeed, a significant portion of self-confidence originated from good experiences of a job that an individual had confronted before. Although there is a debate among critics that challenge the idea of derived confidence, there are numerous successful people who attributed their confidence to their previous good experiences. Also, there is a positive relationship between adaptability with circumstances and self-confidence. The higher self-assurance a person has, the better adjustment to work circumstance has occurred. Based on an experiment which has done in this area, I have read an article about recently; results showed that people who are successful in their job show more natural communication, responsibility, accessibility and adaptation of role in the company. As a whole, people who feel better self-confidence present better adaptation to the job, and their efficiency in the carrier is noticeable.
To summarize, contemplating all remarks, we safely conclude that rather than adaption to a new environment, other elements that determine the success in a job. Factors such as experience that can convince companies to hire a person, also self-confidence, which considered as another essential factor are much more determining element than adaptability for victory in career circumstances.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 777, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r factors like networks can mediate it. Another equally noteworthy reason to bea...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, thus, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 8.0752688172 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2291.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61519607843 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46364289957 2.67179642975 130% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4733633956 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.55 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.65 5.45110844103 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191595877215 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056440489215 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762763720395 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129194803524 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709179603886 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 10.9000537634 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.01818996416 122% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.