Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Leadership, as we all know, for the majority of scientific fields, is a debating issue. Due to its paramount importance, efforts for evaluating its effectiveness have always been among sociologists` top priorities. In this regard, many people support this opinion that people are born with the ability to be a leader. Contrary to common belief, I believe that it is not only an innate ability but also it is a skill that is related to the person`s mental organization and the environment an individual faces. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that leadership originated from a place rather than genes is the mental system that every person had grown up with. As long as one grows up, his or her mind will be complicated. The more a person matured, the more complicated mental systems she or he gains. Thus, evidently, before any complexity happens to a child's mind, we can teach a person from very young ages to be a leader through simple games and methods that their mind can process it. Take my personal experience as an example. A couple of years ago, when my younger sister was a little girl, my parents sent her to the kinder garden. I witness how distinguished ways the tutors used to bring a proficiency for different skills they had taught to the children. Surprisingly, my sister`s ability to handle the situation and also to lead the circumstance to the path she wants is remarkable. The manner she has conceals the way that her mind organized from her childhood.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is the identified role of the surrounding area of a person. Undoubtedly, people are born with natural abilities that are emanated from genes they inherit. Neither there is no approving evidence nor does deny proof exist that reveals the connection between genes and leadership ability. Although many critics may challenge this idea and debate that there are many individuals in high levels of organizations that seem inherently have such an ability, scientifically speaking, many of these leaders just learn how to be an effective and lead other members of a certain group based on the situation they had. To illustrate, people do not look at leadership as a natural ability; rather, they seize this skill as an achieving one. Indeed, there is a common belief that humans are born with an instinct to help and guide people who live with them in the same society, gaining the ability of leadership will provide such an opportunity.
To summarize, contemplating all remarks, we can safely conclude that leadership is a skill that a person can either learn from the others or gain from the taught she or he receives to be a leader from childhood.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2332.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 472.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9406779661 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87571731431 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557203389831 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 733.5 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5822270888 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.047619048 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4761904762 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.95238095238 5.45110844103 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131600825837 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0367306861214 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397406123348 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866166591453 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026697708751 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.