Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations.
I definitely agree with the statement that our current way of living might have a negative effect on the future generations. I think this for the following reasons.
To begin with, we have exploited the natural resources so much to fulfil our current life needs that nothing is left for the future generations. The increasing number of cars and other vehicles used by us for easy transportation, have used up all of the world’s petroleum source without thinking about its impact on the future of human beings. Also, we have used up almost all the fossil fuels to generate energy. The future generations will have to struggle to generate energy to carry out various activities and look for alternatives. Though there are alternatives such as energy production with the help of sunlight but they are costlier.
Furthermore, the air conditioners which we used in the summer vacations and the large industries which produce goods to fulfil our needs, release harmful chemicals in the atmosphere. Thus, causing air pollution. The chlorofluorocarbons released by the ACs cause depletion of the ozone layer which protects us from the harmful sun rays. Forest areas are destroyed to build more industries and factories due to increasing human demands. All these cause a huge impact on the environment, creating more harsh and difficult climatic conditions for the future generations to live in.
Lastly, the increased deforestation done to fulfil our current living standards will lead to less number of trees in the world. This can further lead to lack of enough oxygen for the future generations to breathe in. They might have to carry oxygen tanks to respire.
To sum up, our current living standards and needs will have a devastating impact on the future generations. Thus, it is important that we practice sustainable development and save our planet earth for the future generations as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...s for easy transportation, have used up all of the world’s petroleum source without thinki...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, lastly, look, so, thus, well, i think, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 310.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14516129032 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90086104408 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541935483871 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.916916766 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8235294118 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2352941176 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342060849212 0.236089414692 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104569968897 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104666051313 0.0737576698707 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214023000963 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112416231887 0.0645574589148 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.