Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Parents today are more involved in their children's education than were parents in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In this modern world, education is the most basic part of life to live a peaceful life. It is important because the future of the country depends on this generation. Some people are inclined toward the attitude that nowadays parents do not care about their children education as parents do in past, whereas others hold a different perspective. I personally, though believe that today parents are trying to give the best education to children. In the following essay, I intend to put forth my points and reasons for support.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that the success of a person lies in education as our world is getting advance in technology increases a variety in educational field which can not be imagined in past. The competition is much tougher because everyone is in a race for success. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. When I was accustomed to living in a village where no variety in the educational system was available and fees were absolute low. Children have to study all subjects as we do not have optional courses. Furthermore, when I moved to the city everyone is working hard to be successful, their parents are paying thousands of dollars for a semester and sending the child to tuition separately to make their lives successful.
Secondly, the jobs depend on education, if a person is less educated no one will hire. In past, no such concept exists because all jobs are of minimum wages, and nobody judge other on the basis of job. To exemplify, my grandfather worked in a bank as a senior manager and he had done his bachelor's in accounting. Now, my friend is a double master after accounting unable to find a job according to his education. The parents are educating their child more and more in order to save the future. Thus, this example illustrates that parents are more focused and pay attention to their child's education.
In light of the reasons mentioned, I strongly agree that parents are more worried nowadays than in past, as the world is getting advance. I think, instead of facing more problem in the future face it now and educate your children no matter how much it cost.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
... their children education as parents do in past, whereas others hold a different perspe...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 206, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...ational field which can not be imagined in past. The competition is much tougher becaus...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
...rson is less educated no one will hire. In past, no such concept exists because all job...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'nobody' must be used with a third-person verb: 'judges'.
Suggestion: judges
...l jobs are of minimum wages, and nobody judge other on the basis of job. To exemplify...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 97, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
... parents are more worried nowadays than in past, as the world is getting advance. I thi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72987012987 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66997321285 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555844155844 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.552232853 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8421052632 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2631578947 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57894736842 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297591281199 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832070729933 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829191478792 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185110741193 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651531537895 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.