Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.

Undoubtedly, it is so important for each person to be successful in the present and future. Most of the human try hard when they are younger to guarantee their future and have relative serenity in their lives. Although some people adamantly claim that by the advent of new technologies it is now easier to find a career which leads to a secure future, others disagree. Personally, I am of the opinion that contemporary world has been such competitive that it's really hard to find your route to a secure future. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.

To begin with, as a result of globalization that has been occurring in the recent decade, the economic system of the different countries in the world is inextricably intertwined. Therefore, if we had a crisis in one country, it would affect all the economic chain that is connected to this country. So it would be so hard to find out what career would lead to a better future. For example, my uncle works in the stock market for several years. He had a plenty of experience in investing and predicting the thriving market. Two weeks ago I talked to him to find out about my company's progress. Unfortunately, although it seems so successful, it has no chance in the next decade to survive. So he advised me to search for a better company.

Second, By the advent of the Internet and new communication devices, now everyone can search on the Internet and gain information about new occupation and empty job positions all over the world. Besides, compared to the past, people who live in a country with a high unemployment ratio tend to migrate to another country which had more job opportunities. As most of this migrants are ingenious individuals who want to explore a new world and have high incentives, it would be so difficult to compete with them on a career. In the past, youngsters often chose their father career or pursue their own interest. In both ways, they had a secured future if they strive so hard, but now you are forced to compete with the canny people in the worldwide as much as you can if you want to have a serene future.

All in all, In the past it was easier to have a satisfied future since the trade among the countries all over the world wasn't so expand and you should just try hard instead of competing people in the worldwide.

Votes
Average: 9.2 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... had more job opportunities. As most of this migrants are ingenious individuals who ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... among the countries all over the world wasnt so expand and you should just try hard ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, really, second, so, therefore, for example, i feel, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1929.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57109004739 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67546878892 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507109004739 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5271267902 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.526315789 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2105263158 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05263157895 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187015747394 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507447761909 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524802701503 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10772401259 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250785434672 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.