Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is a perennial and growing debate about it was easier to identify what kind of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future in the past. Some argue that it is the commonly accepted truth that it is less difficult for people to choose a secure and successful job in the past. Others, however, believe that identifying what type of career would lead to a secure, successful future is harder in the past than today. From my perspective, there are more merits than demerits to choose the latter opinion. Therefore, I strongly agree with former point and I will take a closer look at the argument by giving the following reasons.
The immediate and most important reason is that there are no much career choices for people to choose in the past due the development. To compare with the economy nowadays in China, there are more and more careers have been created for the booming of the economy. Take Shenzhen as an example, Shenzhen is a first-tier city in China and it has developed tremendously fast since 1976. It is reported that every month there are nearly 100 new jobs showed up in the market such as interpreters for traveling, drivers for a particular group and so on. In the past, you have never seen such job or career. But because of the development, demanding for different fields has been enlarged. Except for some traditional jobs like teacher or businessman, people have been facing a variety of choices for their career, which could fulfill their dreams and make a living. As a result, it would be more difficult for people to identify what kind of job would lead to a successful future.
Another point worth mentioning is that the concept of success has changed. What type of job is a better job is not a difficult question for people in the past. The reason is that how to view success and security is quite simple and conventional in the past. For instance, when I was young, my mother always tells me that only a job which can make a lot of money will lead to a successful future. So there is a limited choice for me to choose what kind of job in the future. Being a lawyer has been considered a career which is really secure for most people. As a result, it is easier for people in the past to identify a successful job.
Lending further credence to my position is with lacking education, people have a difficult to think about many jobs which actually will lead to a successful future. Those people who have received a hig
In nutshell, I have no choice but to reiterate my view is
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...most important reason is that there are no much career choices for people to choos...
^^
Line 3, column 975, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... job would lead to a successful future. Another point worth mentioning is that t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re. Those people who have received a hig In nutshell, I have no choice but to rei...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, look, really, so, therefore, except for, for instance, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2070.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 455.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54945054945 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52960827107 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446153846154 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 660.6 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6945442772 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0909090909 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6818181818 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.40909090909 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298444433917 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105077157236 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0958300025511 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164065211836 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115530892762 0.0645574589148 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.