Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People behave differently when they wear different clothes. Do you agree that different clothes influence the way people behave? Use specific examples to support your answer.
People love to decorate themselves with their dressing style where they feel comfortable and find them attractive. As fashion industry introduces a new dressing style and outfit every years, they quickly transform or changed their style of dressing according to contemporary fashion and mostly acceptable to their society. Personally, I concur with the statement that people behave mostly how you dressed since people judge your personality and status by looking your external outfit.
Generally people have some intuition towards somebody at first meet by looking their dressing sense. This strongly influence people behavior towards them as they think the person they might be with same personality as they presume.For instance, in our society, people have rooted concept about something on the basis of their dressing style. The people, who dress as punky- grunched shirt and pant, will be considered as the bad guy. People behave this guy differently and shunned them in a social event even though they might be good one than the illicit person in a formal dress.
Most of the people interact with others on the basis of their social status. People with highest fortune likely to be behave with soberiety; while low standard people gets treated with less priority. As the first impression of the people to be rich is deduced by their dressing ability, What they wear strongly affected how they will be treated. A simple paradigm for this situation can be seen in the big shopping mall. The guard will reluctant to give a entrance permit for the person whose dress resembe impoversiation. In contrary to that, a person with extravagant outfit is greeted with smile in their cheeks and willing to serve them if they needed.
In conclusion, dressing style heavily influence mind of the people and unconsiously, they predetermine to behave people only looking at them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... somebody at first meet by looking their dressing sense. This strongly influence ...
^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...e with same personality as they presume.For instance, in our society, people have r...
^^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...e basis of their social status. People with highest fortune likely to be behave with soberi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... mall. The guard will reluctant to give a entrance permit for the person whose dr...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, so, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 304.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17763157895 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57914036603 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6157979258 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.428571429 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92857142857 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203472676533 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831861998255 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682607405248 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145510352833 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0100203284937 0.0645574589148 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.