Do you agree or disagree? People nowadays are more willing to help other people (giving
Food or clothing) than in the past.
On changing times, people's attitudes towards the feeling of the people remain different. It is believed that people nowadays are becoming ruthless and less altruistic to help the people who are in difficulties as compared to the last time. Personally, I concur with the statement because people become insensitive and more concentrated to meet their other needs rather than to help poor people.
The primary reasons are that in present times, people are so entangled with fulfilling their accessory needs that they are unconcerned to help needy people despite their willingness. Nowadays, generally, people tend to live a standard life which relatively costly. Most of the people are striving to manage their expenses such as high rent costs, expensive clothes, costly education, etc. In this heavily burden lifestyle, a general public hard to afford any extra expenses. If there is a slightest increasing shift in expense in their balance sheet, they might not maintain their financial stability. However, it was quite a simple living standard in the past; that's why they were in a strong position to help other people with their surplus. Had they found a similar extravagant lifestyle at that time, they would not be able to hand in others' requirements.
Secondly, past people are more sensitive than the present human that they could not resist seeing other sorrow. During that time, there was less population pressure and people were mostly living in the society consisting of their own relatives. In contrast, we live in a society full of strange people and acquired a thick skin nature seeing a lot of the similar disadvantages group.
In conclusion, people right now rarely give consideration to other's situations due to the established environment. But, previous society was full of empathy and generosity because they were intolerant to let suffer others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-08 | Choiiiiiii | 60 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | andyweixuan | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-23 | shrijan | 76 | view |
| 2017-08-29 | fereshtehRR | 90 | view |
- Jane Austin 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons.First, th 73
- Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives Do you agree or disagree 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...tc. In this heavily burden lifestyle, a general public hard to afford any extra expenses. If t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... afford any extra expenses. If there is a slightest increasing shift in expense i...
^
Line 3, column 663, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...e a simple living standard in the past; thats why they were in a strong position to h...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 300.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25333333333 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72713932334 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596666666667 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.8175730114 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.066666667 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293275946721 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105883433029 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795405922807 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189782738526 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766557174129 0.0645574589148 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.