Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only.
It is axiomatic that in this progressive and sophisticated world where we live, human beings life becomes intricate which made people learn the manifold skills to be successful in this hustle and bustle world. While some individuals do not agree with this idea that it is required for people to develop various skills, on the other hand, a group of people believes that concentrating on one skill is sufficient. As far as I am concerned, I do believe that learning a wide range of abilities is useful for humankind and my reasons to support my idea are presented in the following paragraphs.
First of all, it is crystal clear that due to the emergence of the modern world, people face a huge amount of problems in their life. To be more specific, growing urban life and centralize in big cities help people to improve the quilty of life. However, it makes a lot of difficulties such as working harder to gain more profit, controlling a family is not an easy task in recent decades to name but a few. As a result, humans have to enhance their skills to be successful in contemporary times. For example, parents have to be provided with a wide range of skills in order to raise their children; although it is not a demanding task in a view it requires a huge amount of concerns and skills.
Moreover, nowadays people are not sure about their occupations so they have to always consider the alternative options for themselves in order if they lose their job find a new career. In fact, many companies these days due to several reasons like the advancement of technology, raising the cost of production, lose their stage in the market have to reduce employees. So as to if individuals have various skills not only do they can looking for a new job but also they do not face financial problems. My own experience bring this notion home. A few years ago, I worked for a company in which they made electronic equipment. But after a few months after I began working in that firm, the chief administration decided to close our office, I worked in the research branch of the company. However, since I had skill in logging as a blink of the eye I found a new job in a wood producing company. So I did not face a big problem and did not suffer from unemployment.
In conclusion, having the aforementioned reasons and examples into account, I do believe that take advantage of different skills is necessary for people because humans need them to live in modern times and also it is required if a person want to always be ready for a new occupation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...ophisticated world where we live, human beings life becomes intricate which made peopl...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: To
...in the market have to reduce employees. So as to if individuals have various skills not ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'look'
Suggestion: look
...ave various skills not only do they can looking for a new job but also they do not face...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2090.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58333333333 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73561530646 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508771929825 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.6602839498 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.941176471 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8235294118 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11764705882 5.45110844103 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208362326509 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623981473444 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064048662248 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131534609068 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516362380654 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.