Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without any doubt, we are in the heyday of technological era which requires us to be adapted to these advancements. There are some people that think by concentraining only on one skill they could be successful, while others hold a positive perspective toward the multi-skill profesion persons. As far as I 'm concerned, it is imperative to develop as many skills as possible to thrive, due to the modern period we live in and the competition available in the job market.
To begin with, thanks to the rapid growth of technology, numerous aspects of careers are altered in favor of the modern technology. In fact, to meet our desired goals, it is necessary to possess a variety of skills. Poweful Microsoft skills, are the compelling example of what I mean. Presently, the majority of the jobs include some degree of computer's duties which entiled in learning about many practical softwares, such as Microsofts. People who professionaly know how to work with Words, Excel, and so forth are more prosperous in their careers. Moreover, communication skills, time managing, organization are all example of the important skills which are usefull and indispensible for thriving in our jobs.Therefor, person who has only one skill may be deprived of many job opportunites that need the mentioned skills.
What's more, due to the competetive job market which is difficult for the adepts to find their desired jobs, the less skill-developed people don't have striking chances to find job. My personal experience is a compelling example of this fact. Last year, I had a hard time finding for my preferable job. I found lots of jobs regarding my major on the job offers websites like Indeed, however, all of them had several qualifications that requires me to develove various skills. Henec, I decided to stop looking for job and work more on the important skills, to heighten my chance for getting the best job. After a few month spending on my learning new skills, I became succesful to be hired in an advanced tech-company. Without developing diverse skills, it would be difficult for me to be one of the famous corporation's employees.
To recap, I firmly believe that people should develop many various skills to be able to achieve their success. Without having different skills, finding job in the advanced era it would be impossible. Also, the competetive job market obliges us to develop our skills in order to thrive in finding high-level jobs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 712, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefor
... indispensible for thriving in our jobs.Therefor, person who has only one skill may be d...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 771, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun job seems to be countable; consider using: 'many jobs'.
Suggestion: many jobs
...o has only one skill may be deprived of many job opportunites that need the mentioned sk...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...unites that need the mentioned skills. Whats more, due to the competetive job market...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d jobs, the less skill-developed people dont have striking chances to find job. My p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, moreover, regarding, so, while, i mean, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2034.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98529411765 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94127450817 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544117647059 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7611319887 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.052631579 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4736842105 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31578947368 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190777921651 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606321630092 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063996678228 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137223927454 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440581896052 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.