Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Undoubtedly, plays have a vital role in children’s growth process. Nowadays, computer games have become a trend between kids and youngster. Besides, more serious application of computer games have sprang up in the last decads, and kids are interested to play them. In my opinion, computer games could have positive effects on children in a define circumstance. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will elaborate on them in the following essay.
First, those computer-games increase children's intellectual abilities. The designers of those games put challenges in divers levels which need mental endeavor to be solved, hence kids should think about questions to solve those dilemmas. This practice involves children’s mental power interactively and not only help them learn many useful concepts and ideas but also increase their patients and other personal characters in kids. To put this in perspective, my eight-year-old daughter used to play a computer games, named word scramble, she attempted to solve a simple word puzzle at first in a long time relatively. After a while, she could solve more complicated puzzle faster. This game not only teaches her many unfamiliar words, but she had a wonderful feeling after getting a diamond as a prize in that game. When she leveled up to the professional in that game, she learned enormous words with their spelling, which improve her writing in school.
Second, these computer games have become a trend between the young and children. From the psychological aspect, it is so critical that our children have access to some of those games, especially the useful ones. If we prevent them playing such a useful computer game, they will circumvent us and maybe get busy playing with unsuitable applications. Hence, there is a big worry around the computer games and application world and parents should involve and manage children’s access to those games. As an example, my nephew, Sam, a ten-year-old boy, is used to playing computer games at least five hours a day. His parents are so busy and they don’t have a chance to observe him. Recently, he shows some negative behaviors which I believe he needs a psychological intervention. His father agrees with me and he found some disrupting sleeping habits because his son addicted to watch some dangerous games affecting his mind.
In conclusion, I believe that children should play computer games, because it has some beneficial effects for them, such as improving their intellectual abilities. Furthermore, because kids are eager to play those fashion games. Of course, this allowance should be supervised by parents of care givers, otherwise it may affect kids negatively.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-12 Iman karim 76 view
2023-07-12 Iman karim 60 view
2022-11-17 anman 70 view
2022-11-16 joyce05 66 view
2022-10-29 Sumilak 80 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user bijan54 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'sprung'.
Suggestion: sprung
...ious application of computer games have sprang up in the last decads, and kids are int...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 339, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ld have positive effects on children in a define circumstance. I feel this way for two r...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, second, so, while, at least, i feel, in conclusion, of course, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2251.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19861431871 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84845057333 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556581986143 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 698.4 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6416843486 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8695652174 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8260869565 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13043478261 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280272403898 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841302223849 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534375102658 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17995557963 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023854566765 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.