Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The advent of internet have had a profound impact on people's daily life. This influence is so immense that without access to the internet we might not be able to do the most superficial tasks. Personally, however, I believe people must pay for their internet. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following sentence.
To begin with, the analogy between building roads and internet access is so wrong. Constructing some superficial facilities to enhance public welfare services of cities is one of the very basic duties of cities' municipalities, and governors are responsible to fulfill it due to the taxes they get from citizens. However, there are some other indispensable services which people still have to pay for them, such as electricity, water, gas or oil. These services are highly dependent on limited natural resources and we should be careful with spending them. One thing that most people don't know about internet is that internet is also a limited resource. The bandwidth that people purchase from different internet companies is limited and there are heavy fines for those who use more than their dedicated bandwidth. Thus, everyone has to have their own specific data band and they have to pay to keep it for themselves, like electricity or gas.
Another significant reason is that although internet have made a great progress during last couple of decades, there are still a great number of engineers and researchers who put effort and time to make it better. As I said before radio bandwidth, which conventional internet works on, is a limited resource, and telecommunication engineers do great researches to optimize user's traffic and make the best use out of limited bandwidth. Plus, researchers have been trying to improve internet access and give services to the most remote regions on earth. For instance, Starlink company is running a huge project and use satellites to cover the whole globe and give high speed internet access to its users all around the world. It is not hard to guess how much fortune each of these researches and projects might cost for their investors. Thereby, considering all these endeavor, time and money people put to make living easier for people, the cost we pay for internet services is not unreasonable anymore.
In conclusion, in developed countries people have to pay for the services they get and internet is not an exception. Internet is a limited natural resource and researches about it costs a lot of money, so paying for it is not unfair.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 583, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ending them. One thing that most people dont know about internet is that internet is...
^^^^
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'great progress'.
Suggestion: great progress
...son is that although internet have made a great progress during last couple of decades, there ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, thus, as to, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2108.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97169811321 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72879295014 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530660377358 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5610119898 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.947368421 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3157894737 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247276958536 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866991900317 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551635144804 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158249046285 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287151505259 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.