Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Indubitably, in this modern and sophisticated world, the internet plays an incredibly important role in human lives; Accordingly, what is beyond dispute is the endless debate regarding whether governments are supposed to provide it to citizens at no cost or not. In this context, some people cling to the notion that the internet should be free, nevertheless some others stand by the viewpoint that there should be charges for internet usage. I, for one, concur with the latter notion. I hold this position based on a twofold rationale, which I shall expound upon in the ensuing discourse.
To commence with, admittedly, the internet is widely used as one of the basic requirements for living. To be more concrete, living without the internet is impossible just like living without electricity or gas. On the other hand, it is important to consider that governments are not providing these utilities for free, hence they can make money to provide them. As a result, not getting money in order to provide utilities may cause usage and waste. My own personal experience serves as a highly compelling and noteworthy illustration of this phenomenon. I used to live in a country, where the internet was free. We used to download everything or stream easily. This created a habit of even downloading stuff that we did not need. This leads to an Internet yearly budget yearly increase for the government due to high consumption. After my immigration to the United States, I had to pay for my consumption and could not just download everything at no charge. I learned to utilize the internet as much as I need. I found out this country has a specially dedicated budget for the internet and uses the rest on other stuff like making the cities more convenient to live in. Had my country charged residents for internet, they would have been able to save some money to invest in cities.
Another key point to consider is that people are not using the internet in the same amount. To put it in a more vivid picture, Some just use the internet for regular daily net social media surfing, while others utilize it for streaming and other things that need high-speed internet. My own experience can drive this notion home. My father just uses the internet for using online maps and some surfing on the net. Despite this, I am using it for movie streaming and making videos, and uploading them for my carrier. Ergo, I need much more speed than my father. Consequently, we can pay for what we use and save the rest. With free internet, I would have used much more government money than my dad which is not fair.
In summary, after carefully considering all the aforementioned arguments, I am firmly convinced that governments' charging residents for the internet is more beneficial. This is because not only do citizens regulate their usage to their needs, but also people with different usage, are using the governmental budget more fairly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, hence, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, while, in summary, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2425.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 500.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69142267212 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 779.4 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3013584792 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8148148148 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5185185185 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225264788208 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681704993273 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486080866392 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159084477182 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0130601748254 0.0645574589148 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.