Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict
Some people argue that the rules that societies today expect young people to obey are too severe, while other people believe that this rule is far more looser than past. This issue can be approached from several angles because of its complexity. After deeply deliberating, I think that the rules today are not rigid for three reasons.
One of the important reason that the rules are not strict nowadays is that young people can do themselves more than the past. In modern societies, The definition of success for youths are flexible. Every kind of works is considered excellent as long as it delights the job-takers themselves. In contrast, the definition of good jobs is that it brings family honor in the past. For example, cookers who are considered low-class in the past because they are servant of nobility are now deem great for many chefs love cook from their heart and share delicious foods to people. This way, young people has less constraint in that they are just expected to be happy nowadays, instead of to bring glory to their family.
Secondly, the rules nowadays can't be rigorous due to the development of technology. Admittedly, there are still some people want to restrain youths. However, it is just the exception. Thanks to the advent of the Internet, the distance between people is widened, and rules cannot be enforced as strict as before. Now people can work from home, make friends from websites, and even live without leaving their houses. Because of the anonymity on the Internet, societies hardly enforce rules which are expected youth to follow. In addition, even if the rules are enforced, young people could cut the relations and ignore these rules easily. Thus, as the technology progress, the rules obligated youths become more and more loose.
Lastly, that young people are free to fall in love with anyone testifies the rules which societies expect youths to obey is not severe. Nowadays, girls and boys can walk out with anyone they like and break up at anytime they feel they don't fit to each other. Compared to the past, young people are only allowed to conduct a love affair with someone their parent arrange. Hence, we can find out that the rules about youths' relation is not as rigid as before.
Although there are some people expect youths to follow strict rules, however, the rules still loosen as time elapses and young people can do what they want more than the past. With the reasons and I mention above, I believe that the rules that oblige youths to follow are loose in this modern society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'looser' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: looser
...er people believe that this rule is far more looser than past. This issue can be approached...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'deemed'.
Suggestion: deemed
...se they are servant of nobility are now deem great for many chefs love cook from the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...family. Secondly, the rules nowadays cant be rigorous due to the development of t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 236, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... and break up at anytime they feel they dont fit to each other. Compared to the past...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, for example, i think, in addition, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2113.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8352402746 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27224783926 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494279176201 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 657.9 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9060524952 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8695652174 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4347826087 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328050157877 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914013962216 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939291021223 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204532479577 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667557661321 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.