Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Speaking of the rules for the youngsters to follow, someone believes that it is too strict for them to release their individuality. However, I think that the rules are not only reasonable, but also beneficial for young people since they can help them to control themselves and protect them from hurting themselves.
First of all, those rules can help the youngsters to control themselves. Since the young people are not mature enough to control themselves, rules that are designed for them are preventing them from making stupid mistakes. Take the rules in my school for example. At first, there was no rule to restrict the use of cellphone at class. When we were taking a class, my friend Jack who sat beside me just could not hold himself from using it to watch some interesting videos or playing games, which really distracted him from the class and the points made by the teacher. In that case, he had a great degradation on his grades. However, after the prohibition of taking cellphones into classrooms were published, he had no distraction from the class and had more attention on what the teacher is saying, in which case his grade was greatly improved. So rules can really help the youngsters to control themselves.
Secondly, rules can protect them from hurting themselves. It is widely acknowledged that alcohol is harmful to young people's physical health. It is detrimental for people to drink it at a young age, since it would cause an extreme addiction to it and a long-lasting harm to liver. For example, my uncle had drunk too much alcohol when he was young since the ban for youngsters to buy alcohol was not strictly carried out. So every week he went out with his friends and drunk too much wine, which cause damage to his liver. As for now he had a liver disease which brings him a lot of pain, which could have been avoided if the rules were strictly carried out.
Although the rule of wearing school uniforms seems strict for students. However, it is designed under the consideration of possibility of the situation that many students from different family conditions will have a bad habit of comparing with each other on wearing, which will distract them from their study and therefore have a bad influence on their grades. So even this uniform rule is reasonable for youngsters.
Taking what has been discussed above into consideration, rules that societies expect young people to follow today are not stringent. On the contrary, it helps young people in a lot of aspects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-21 | slliland | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-10 | sonyeoso | 90 | view |
| 2023-03-04 | saharmnd | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-25 | Chloe4112002 | 90 | view |
- The rules that the whole societies today expect to young people to follow and obey are too strict 84
- Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile s main source of power the internal combustion engine By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hydrogen based fuel cell engine which 68
- The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, as for, for example, i think, speaking of, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2079.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83488372093 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6065203011 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.0664476887 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4761904762 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167979642229 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617396253924 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543847244574 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122988085656 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708152830598 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, as for, for example, i think, speaking of, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2079.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83488372093 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6065203011 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.0664476887 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4761904762 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167979642229 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617396253924 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543847244574 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122988085656 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708152830598 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.