Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Today, societies' rules have been changed by communities' development. Some people believe these rules are strict, but others believe they are not. I, personally, believe these new rules not only are not strict but also are helpful for people, especially for young people. I feel this way because of two main reasons, which I will explain in the following paragraphs.
First of all, people have more freedom in their choices, in different subjects. People are different on many sides. For example, they have various religions, or they have different favor on sexual issues. In the past, people, who were in minority, could not express their interests and belief; because they were unnormal in their society, and they were punished by their societies. Paradoxically, in new societies, people can have their own beliefs without any fear; because new rules contain all people's rights. For instance, today, people who are homosexual can marry together easily. But in the past, it was not acceptable to society, because their religion considered this behavior as a sin. Hence, they were punished by the church.
Secondly, people can be safe in their society more than past. New rules can protect people in front of people, who want to hurt them, like robbers and killers, more than they did in the past. Furthermore, these rules can protect women's rights more than past. Thus, these rules can prevent more violence and injustice in societies. For illustration. it is worth to point my friend's experience, who lives in Canada. She had a problem with her boyfriend, so he started to bother her. He threatened her with her photos, and he wanted to share her pictures on social media. Therefore, she called the police, and they protect her, and they warned him, if he continues this behavior, they will arrest him. Eventually, he had to stop bothering her.
To sum up, I, strongly, believe that new rules are not too strict. This is because these rules can pave the way for an easy life for all people with different beliefs and favors. Besides, these rules can protect people more than they did in the past.
- Sometimes filmmakers make movies that are based on books When a movie is based on a book some people prefer to read the book before watching the movie Other people prefer to read the book only after they have watched the movie Which do you prefer and why 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Toward the end of his life the Chevalier de Seingalt 1725 1798 wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure but since he met many famous people including kings and writers his memoir has become a 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 60
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'communities'' or 'community's'?
Suggestion: communities'; community's
...y, societies rules have been changed by communities development. Some people believe these ...
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
...justice in societies. For illustration. it is worth to point my friends experience...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i feel, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93521126761 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46299330986 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515492957746 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2159054974 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.0 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7916666667 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123927000874 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422900653313 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372355470651 0.0737576698707 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982093943225 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479905510207 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.78 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.